From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 00/16] KVM: arm64: GICv3 ITS emulation
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 18:18:39 +0300
Message-ID: <00dc01d10501$46352810$d29f7830$@samsung.com>
References: <1444229726-31559-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com>
 <20151010153744.GH29128@cbox> <561BBFC1.4070200@arm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: marc.zyngier@arm.com, eric.auger@linaro.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: 'Andre Przywara' <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	'Christoffer Dall' <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mailout4.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.14]:29772 "EHLO
	mailout4.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751073AbbJLPSm (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 12 Oct 2015 11:18:42 -0400
Received: from eucpsbgm1.samsung.com (unknown [203.254.199.244])
 by mailout4.w1.samsung.com
 (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.31.0 64bit (built May  5 2014))
 with ESMTP id <0NW4006D9574N490@mailout4.w1.samsung.com> for
 kvm@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 16:18:40 +0100 (BST)
In-reply-to: <561BBFC1.4070200@arm.com>
Content-language: ru
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

 Hello!

> Also what is the status of Eric's IRQ routing support? Should this go in
> first now?

 I'd say without vITS there's nothing to use IRQ routing with. It could go in and just lay around
silently, so that it's not forgotten, but for example current qemu just knows that with GICv2m it
should use hardcoded linear MSI->SPI mapping.

Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia