From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Liran Alon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: nVMX/nSVM: Don't intercept #UD when running L2 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 05:29:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <01c24583-6a69-4115-a5bb-fe0fadfc50c6@default> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: , , , , , To: Return-path: Received: from aserp2120.oracle.com ([141.146.126.78]:50596 "EHLO aserp2120.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933720AbeAKN3q (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jan 2018 08:29:46 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: ----- pbonzini@redhat.com wrote: > On 11/01/2018 00:01, Liran Alon wrote: > >=20 > > ----- jmattson@google.com wrote: > >=20 > >> Liran, Are you planning to submit reverts for ae1f57670703 and > >> ac9b305caa0d? > >=20 > > Yes. > > I just didn't had time to deal with this as I was busy with other > Oracle Ravello specific issues. > > I think reverting both commits is the right thing to do. > >=20 > > Paolo: Note that the VMware Backdoor support series we have patched > here (was not yet queued) is based a bit on the code of this commit. > Do you wish me to first wait that those patches will be queued and > then I will create the revert for these (and resolve relevant > conflicts) or that I will create the reverts for these on top of what > is currently queued and you will resolve the conflicts resulting when > applying VMware Backdoor support series? >=20 > I can take care of the reverts, but you'll have to repost the > backdoor > series. Unfortunately due to my involvement with Spectre in Red Hat > (and Radim's vacation :)) I have fallen short on the review backlog. >=20 > Paolo No problem. I will wait until you queue the reverts to adjust the VMware backdoor serie= s accordingly. Thanks, -Liran