From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Subject: Re: KVM: s390: Move two error code assignments in kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log() Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:47:26 +0100 Message-ID: <02eaa91d-55d7-ce02-3db8-a7db5d1ff679@users.sourceforge.net> References: <70f41e59-d8a4-de42-6064-80ecf6acc065@users.sourceforge.net> <35411200-2bd6-1c65-7d7f-21a6353875ea@de.ibm.com> <01d581bb-9db6-cba1-e476-49c814c3ebf0@users.sourceforge.net> <50ae2ba4-572d-8524-fc31-acc1a8d1ad99@de.ibm.com> <75c6315c-8947-2816-64da-947f6a29ac57@users.sourceforge.net> <64b94d75-6bad-1ebc-c35e-c036202bab01@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Cornelia Huck , Heiko Carstens , Martin Schwidefsky , =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_Borntr=c3=a4ger?= , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: kernel-janitors-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org >> I am curious if other update suggestions will be picked up >> in a constructive way. > > There is only one person on this list that is not constructive, You could accept a few patches from my selection of change possibilities already. > and that person is you. I assume that some dialogue steps would be needed to find a “common wave length” again so that the communication might become useful also in your view. Regards, Markus