public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "André Przywara" <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	drjones@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: eric.auger@redhat.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 09/12] arm/arm64: gic: Make check_acked() more generic
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 15:52:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <03d0cfff-d7ce-3227-c6ec-7213b09dfd65@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201217141400.106137-10-alexandru.elisei@arm.com>

On 17/12/2020 14:13, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> Testing that an interrupt is received as expected is done in three places:
> in check_ipi_sender(), check_irqnr() and check_acked(). check_irqnr()
> compares the interrupt ID with IPI_IRQ and records a failure in bad_irq,
> and check_ipi_sender() compares the sender with IPI_SENDER and writes to
> bad_sender when they don't match.
> 
> Let's move all the checks to check_acked() by renaming
> bad_sender->irq_sender and bad_irq->irq_number and changing their semantics
> so they record the interrupt sender, respectively the irq number.
> check_acked() now takes two new parameters: the expected interrupt number
> and sender.
> 
> This has two distinct advantages:
> 
> 1. check_acked() and ipi_handler() can now be used for interrupts other
>    than IPIs.
> 2. Correctness checks are consolidated in one function.
> 
> CC: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>

Look all like valid transformations to me, and indeed it's more reusable
now:

Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>

Cheers,
Andre

> ---
>  arm/gic.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arm/gic.c b/arm/gic.c
> index a9ef1a5def56..fb91861900b7 100644
> --- a/arm/gic.c
> +++ b/arm/gic.c
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ struct gic {
>  
>  static struct gic *gic;
>  static int acked[NR_CPUS], spurious[NR_CPUS];
> -static int bad_sender[NR_CPUS], bad_irq[NR_CPUS];
> +static int irq_sender[NR_CPUS], irq_number[NR_CPUS];
>  static cpumask_t ready;
>  
>  static void nr_cpu_check(int nr)
> @@ -57,8 +57,8 @@ static void stats_reset(void)
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; ++i) {
>  		acked[i] = 0;
> -		bad_sender[i] = -1;
> -		bad_irq[i] = -1;
> +		irq_sender[i] = -1;
> +		irq_number[i] = -1;
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -92,9 +92,10 @@ static void wait_for_interrupts(cpumask_t *mask)
>  	report_info("interrupts timed-out (5s)");
>  }
>  
> -static bool check_acked(cpumask_t *mask)
> +static bool check_acked(cpumask_t *mask, int sender, int irqnum)
>  {
>  	int missing = 0, extra = 0, unexpected = 0;
> +	bool has_gicv2 = (gic_version() == 2);
>  	bool pass = true;
>  	int cpu;
>  
> @@ -108,17 +109,19 @@ static bool check_acked(cpumask_t *mask)
>  			if (acked[cpu])
>  				++unexpected;
>  		}
> +		if (!acked[cpu])
> +			continue;
>  		smp_rmb(); /* pairs with smp_wmb in ipi_handler */
>  
> -		if (bad_sender[cpu] != -1) {
> +		if (has_gicv2 && irq_sender[cpu] != sender) {
>  			report_info("cpu%d received IPI from wrong sender %d",
> -					cpu, bad_sender[cpu]);
> +					cpu, irq_sender[cpu]);
>  			pass = false;
>  		}
>  
> -		if (bad_irq[cpu] != -1) {
> +		if (irq_number[cpu] != irqnum) {
>  			report_info("cpu%d received wrong irq %d",
> -					cpu, bad_irq[cpu]);
> +					cpu, irq_number[cpu]);
>  			pass = false;
>  		}
>  	}
> @@ -143,26 +146,18 @@ static void check_spurious(void)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static void check_ipi_sender(u32 irqstat, int sender)
> +static int gic_get_sender(int irqstat)
>  {
> -	if (gic_version() == 2) {
> -		int src = (irqstat >> 10) & 7;
> -
> -		if (src != sender)
> -			bad_sender[smp_processor_id()] = src;
> -	}
> -}
> -
> -static void check_irqnr(u32 irqnr)
> -{
> -	if (irqnr != IPI_IRQ)
> -		bad_irq[smp_processor_id()] = irqnr;
> +	if (gic_version() == 2)
> +		return (irqstat >> 10) & 7;
> +	return -1;
>  }
>  
>  static void ipi_handler(struct pt_regs *regs __unused)
>  {
>  	u32 irqstat = gic_read_iar();
>  	u32 irqnr = gic_iar_irqnr(irqstat);
> +	int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
>  
>  	if (irqnr != GICC_INT_SPURIOUS) {
>  		gic_write_eoir(irqstat);
> @@ -173,12 +168,12 @@ static void ipi_handler(struct pt_regs *regs __unused)
>  		 */
>  		if (gic_version() == 2)
>  			smp_rmb();
> -		check_ipi_sender(irqstat, IPI_SENDER);
> -		check_irqnr(irqnr);
> +		irq_sender[this_cpu] = gic_get_sender(irqstat);
> +		irq_number[this_cpu] = irqnr;
>  		smp_wmb(); /* pairs with smp_rmb in check_acked */
> -		++acked[smp_processor_id()];
> +		++acked[this_cpu];
>  	} else {
> -		++spurious[smp_processor_id()];
> +		++spurious[this_cpu];
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Wait for writes to acked/spurious to complete */
> @@ -314,40 +309,42 @@ static void gicv3_ipi_send_broadcast(void)
>  
>  static void ipi_test_self(void)
>  {
> +	int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
>  	cpumask_t mask;
>  
>  	report_prefix_push("self");
>  	stats_reset();
>  	cpumask_clear(&mask);
> -	cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &mask);
> +	cpumask_set_cpu(this_cpu, &mask);
>  	gic->ipi.send_self();
>  	wait_for_interrupts(&mask);
> -	report(check_acked(&mask), "Interrupts received");
> +	report(check_acked(&mask, this_cpu, IPI_IRQ), "Interrupts received");
>  	report_prefix_pop();
>  }
>  
>  static void ipi_test_smp(void)
>  {
> +	int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
>  	cpumask_t mask;
>  	int i;
>  
>  	report_prefix_push("target-list");
>  	stats_reset();
>  	cpumask_copy(&mask, &cpu_present_mask);
> -	for (i = smp_processor_id() & 1; i < nr_cpus; i += 2)
> +	for (i = this_cpu & 1; i < nr_cpus; i += 2)
>  		cpumask_clear_cpu(i, &mask);
>  	gic_ipi_send_mask(IPI_IRQ, &mask);
>  	wait_for_interrupts(&mask);
> -	report(check_acked(&mask), "Interrupts received");
> +	report(check_acked(&mask, this_cpu, IPI_IRQ), "Interrupts received");
>  	report_prefix_pop();
>  
>  	report_prefix_push("broadcast");
>  	stats_reset();
>  	cpumask_copy(&mask, &cpu_present_mask);
> -	cpumask_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &mask);
> +	cpumask_clear_cpu(this_cpu, &mask);
>  	gic->ipi.send_broadcast();
>  	wait_for_interrupts(&mask);
> -	report(check_acked(&mask), "Interrupts received");
> +	report(check_acked(&mask, this_cpu, IPI_IRQ), "Interrupts received");
>  	report_prefix_pop();
>  }
>  
> @@ -396,6 +393,7 @@ static void ipi_clear_active_handler(struct pt_regs *regs __unused)
>  {
>  	u32 irqstat = gic_read_iar();
>  	u32 irqnr = gic_iar_irqnr(irqstat);
> +	int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
>  
>  	if (irqnr != GICC_INT_SPURIOUS) {
>  		void *base;
> @@ -408,11 +406,11 @@ static void ipi_clear_active_handler(struct pt_regs *regs __unused)
>  
>  		writel(val, base + GICD_ICACTIVER);
>  
> -		check_ipi_sender(irqstat, smp_processor_id());
> -		check_irqnr(irqnr);
> -		++acked[smp_processor_id()];
> +		irq_sender[this_cpu] = gic_get_sender(irqstat);
> +		irq_number[this_cpu] = irqnr;
> +		++acked[this_cpu];
>  	} else {
> -		++spurious[smp_processor_id()];
> +		++spurious[this_cpu];
>  	}
>  }
>  
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-18 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-17 14:13 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 00/12] GIC fixes and improvements Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-17 14:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 01/12] lib: arm/arm64: gicv3: Add missing barrier when sending IPIs Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-18 12:03   ` André Przywara
2020-12-17 14:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 02/12] lib: arm/arm64: gicv2: " Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-17 14:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 03/12] arm/arm64: gic: Remove SMP synchronization from ipi_clear_active_handler() Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-18 12:04   ` André Przywara
2020-12-17 14:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 04/12] arm/arm64: gic: Remove unnecessary synchronization with stats_reset() Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-17 14:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 05/12] arm/arm64: gic: Use correct memory ordering for the IPI test Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-18 12:04   ` André Przywara
2020-12-17 14:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 06/12] arm/arm64: gic: Check spurious and bad_sender in the active test Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-17 14:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 07/12] arm/arm64: gic: Wait for writes to acked or spurious to complete Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-17 14:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 08/12] arm/arm64: gic: Split check_acked() into two functions Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-18 15:52   ` André Przywara
2021-01-25 17:27     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-01-27 15:10       ` Andre Przywara
2021-01-27 16:00         ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-16 18:04           ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-17 14:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 09/12] arm/arm64: gic: Make check_acked() more generic Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-18 15:52   ` André Przywara [this message]
2020-12-17 14:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 10/12] arm64: gic: its-trigger: Don't trigger the LPI while it is pending Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-18 18:15   ` André Przywara
2021-01-25 16:57     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-17 14:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 11/12] lib: arm64: gic-v3-its: Add wmb() barrier before INT command Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-18 18:36   ` André Przywara
2021-01-25 15:16     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-17 14:14 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 12/12] arm64: gic: Use IPI test checking for the LPI tests Alexandru Elisei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=03d0cfff-d7ce-3227-c6ec-7213b09dfd65@arm.com \
    --to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox