From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Xiao Guangrong Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: page track: add a new notifier type: track_flush_slot Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 21:39:55 +0800 Message-ID: <06340187-61d8-ed7a-e40d-264ca3eb4b37@linux.intel.com> References: <1259cdba-c137-c3da-abe2-ecf51aec6738@linux.intel.com> <523e1446-75f1-fe3a-d818-f7d238d57751@redhat.com> <5800B579.9000705@intel.com> <20161014084158.623087aa@t450s.home> <20161014084601.2a50ba87@t450s.home> <20161014163545.GA6121@nvidia.com> <20161014105124.42b438a6@t450s.home> <20161014221901.GA8865@nvidia.com> <20161017100229.1474ae33@t450s.home> <580617BD.8000300@intel.com> <20161018085918.61ec0e93@t450s.home> <5806DB2D.6090306@intel.com> <2f04a53d-261c-7fb5-6825-117da6a1307d@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Tian, Kevin" , Neo Jia , kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel , Xiaoguang Chen , Kirti Wankhede To: Paolo Bonzini , Xiao Guangrong , Jike Song , Alex Williamson Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 10/19/2016 07:56 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 19/10/2016 07:45, Xiao Guangrong wrote: >> >> >> On 10/19/2016 10:32 AM, Jike Song wrote: >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_group_set_usrdata); >>>>> + >>>>> +void *vfio_group_get_usrdata(struct vfio_group *group) >>>>> +{ >>>>> + return group->usrdata; >>>>> +} >>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_group_get_usrdata); >>>>> + >>>>> +void *vfio_group_get_usrdata_by_device(struct device *dev) >>>>> +{ >>>>> + struct vfio_group *vfio_group; >>>>> + >>>>> + vfio_group = __vfio_group_get_from_iommu(dev->iommu_group); >>>> >>>> We actually need to use iommu_group_get() here. Kirti adds a >>>> vfio_group_get_from_dev() in v9 03/12 that does this properly. >>>> >>>>> + if (!vfio_group) >>>>> + return NULL; >>>>> + >>>>> + return vfio_group_get_usrdata(vfio_group); >> >> I am worrying if the kvm instance got from group->usrdata is safe >> enough? What happens if you get the instance after kvm released >> kvm-vfio device? > > It shouldn't happen if you use kvm_get_kvm and kvm_put_kvm properly. It > is almost okay in the patch, just: > How about if KVM releases kvm-vfio device between vfio_group_get_usrdata() and get_kvm()?