From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: [RFC 09/10] x86/enter: Create macros to restrict/unrestrict Indirect Branch Speculation Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 10:12:28 -0800 Message-ID: <07daf763-cd29-5d1c-1488-1fcb5b440347@linux.intel.com> References: <7c0b0879-3448-43e4-8380-4708fc787113@default> <50c5d627-8975-184b-b50f-4cc02c5816c5@intel.com> <1516957886.30244.161.camel@infradead.org> <20180126175901.GL26209@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <1516990288.30244.253.camel@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Dave Hansen , Liran Alon , Laura Abbott , Andrew Lutomirski , Janakarajan Natarajan , Borislav Petkov , "Mallick, Asit K" , =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= , KarimAllah Ahmed , Peter Anvin , Jun Nakajima , Ingo Molnar , the arch/x86 maintainers , Ashok Raj , "Van De Ven, Arjan" , Tim Chen , Paolo Bonzini , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Peter Zijlstra , Andi Kleen , Linus Torvalds Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1516990288.30244.253.camel@infradead.org> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 1/26/2018 10:11 AM, David Woodhouse wrote: > > I am *actively* ignoring Skylake right now. This is about per-SKL > userspace even with SMEP, because we think Intel's document lies to us. if you think we lie to you then I think we're done with the conversation? Please tell us then what you deploy in AWS for your customers ? or show us research that shows we lied to you?