From: Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
Johannes Wikner <kwikner@ethz.ch>,
Alyssa Milburn <alyssa.milburn@linux.intel.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
Joao Moreira <joao.moreira@intel.com>,
Joseph Nuzman <joseph.nuzman@intel.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: KVM vs AMD: Re: [PATCH v3 48/59] x86/retbleed: Add SKL return thunk
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 22:53:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <08bbd7ab-049e-3cc3-f814-636669b856be@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y1K5D2u6pzXRQz6a@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
On 21/10/2022 16:21, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 11:53:09AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 04:10:28PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>>> This commit is now in -next as commit 5d8213864ade ("x86/retbleed: Add
>>> SKL return thunk"). I just bisected an immediate reboot on my AMD test
>>> system when starting a virtual machine with QEMU + KVM to it (see the
>>> bisect log below). My Intel test systems do not show this.
>>> Unfortunately, I do not have much more information, as there are no logs
>>> in journalctl, which makes sense as the reboot occurs immediately after
>>> I hit the enter key for the QEMU command.
>>>
>>> If there is any further information I can provide or patches I can test
>>> for further debugging, I am more than happy to do so.
>> Moo :-(
>>
>> you happen to have a .config for me?
> Sure thing, sorry I did not provide it in the first place! Attached. It
> has been run through localmodconfig for the particular machine but I
> assume the core pieces should still be present.
Following up from some debugging on IRC.
The problem is that FILL_RETURN_BUFFER now has a per-cpu variable
access, and AMD SVM has a fun optimisation where the VMRUN instruction
doesn't swap, amongst other things, %gs.
per-cpu variables only become safe following
vmload(__sme_page_pa(sd->save_area)); in svm_vcpu_enter_exit().
Given that retbleed=force ought to work on non-skylake hardware, the
appropriate fix is to move the VMLOAD/VMSAVE's down into asm and put
them adjacent to VMRUN.
This also addresses an undocumented dependency where its only the memory
clobber in vmload() which stops the compiler moving
svm_vcpu_enter_exit()'s calculation of sd into an unsafe position.
~Andrew
next parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-03 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20220915111039.092790446@infradead.org>
[not found] ` <20220915111147.890071690@infradead.org>
[not found] ` <Y1HVZKW4o0KRsMtq@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
[not found] ` <Y1JsBQAhDFB2C0OE@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
[not found] ` <Y1K5D2u6pzXRQz6a@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
2022-11-03 22:53 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2022-11-04 12:44 ` KVM vs AMD: Re: [PATCH v3 48/59] x86/retbleed: Add SKL return thunk Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-04 15:29 ` Andrew Cooper
2022-11-04 15:32 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-11-07 9:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=08bbd7ab-049e-3cc3-f814-636669b856be@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=alyssa.milburn@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=joao.moreira@intel.com \
--cc=joseph.nuzman@intel.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwikner@ethz.ch \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox