public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com,
	cohuck@redhat.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 00/16] s390x: Testing SSCH, CSCH and HSCH for errors
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 14:21:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0cee034e-5345-e308-4efb-8c01d94fb74e@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1617694853-6881-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com>


Hi all,

I forgot to write that some tests about addressing will fail if the 
following QEMU patch is not installed:

Subject: [PATCH v1 0/1] s390x: css: report errors from 
ccw_dstream_read/write
Date: Tue,  6 Apr 2021 09:44:12 +0200
Message-Id: <1617695053-7328-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com>


Regards,
Pierre


On 4/6/21 9:40 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
> The goal of this series is to test some of the I/O instructions,
> SSCH, CSCH and HSCH for errors like invalid parameters, addressing,
> timing etc.
> We can not test the sending of an instruction before the last instruction
> has been proceeded by QEMU due to the QEMU serialization but we can
> check the behavior of an instruction if it is started before the status
> of the last instruction is read.
> 
> To do this we first separate the waiting for the interruption and the
> checking of the IRB and enable the subchannel without an I/O ISC to
> avoid interruptions at this subchannel and second, we add an argument
> to the routine in charge to check the IRB representing the expected
> SCSW control field of the IRB.
> 
> We also need several other enhancements to the testing environment:
> 
> - definitions for the SCSW control bits
> - a new function to disable a subchannel
> - a macro to simplify skiping tests when no device is present
>    (I know the warning about return in macro, can we accept it?)
> 
> In the new tests we assume that all the test preparation is working and
> use asserts for all function for which we do not expect a failure.
> 
> regards,
> Pierre
> 
> PS: Sorry, I needed to modify patches 4 and 5 for which I already had RB or AB.
>      I removed them even I hope you will agree with my modifications.
> 
> 
> Pierre Morel (16):
>    s390x: lib: css: disabling a subchannel
>    s390x: lib: css: SCSW bit definitions
>    s390x: css: simplify skipping tests on no device
>    s390x: lib: css: separate wait for IRQ and check I/O completion
>    s390x: lib: css: add SCSW ctrl expectations to check I/O completion
>    s390x: lib: css: checking I/O errors
>    s390x: css: testing ssch errors
>    s390x: css: ssch check for cpa zero
>    s390x: css: ssch with mis aligned ORB
>    s390x: css: ssch checking addressing errors
>    s390x: css: No support for MIDAW
>    s390x: css: Check ORB reserved bits
>    s390x: css: checking for CSS extensions
>    s390x: css: issuing SSCH when the channel is status pending
>    s390x: css: testing halt subchannel
>    s390x: css: testing clear subchannel
> 
>   lib/s390x/css.h     |  42 ++++-
>   lib/s390x/css_lib.c | 138 ++++++++++++--
>   s390x/css.c         | 425 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>   s390x/unittests.cfg |   8 +-
>   4 files changed, 565 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> 

-- 
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen

      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-06 12:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-06  7:40 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 00/16] s390x: Testing SSCH, CSCH and HSCH for errors Pierre Morel
2021-04-06  7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 01/16] s390x: lib: css: disabling a subchannel Pierre Morel
2021-04-06  7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 02/16] s390x: lib: css: SCSW bit definitions Pierre Morel
2021-04-06  7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 03/16] s390x: css: simplify skipping tests on no device Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 12:44   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-07 10:53     ` Pierre Morel
2021-04-06  7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 04/16] s390x: lib: css: separate wait for IRQ and check I/O completion Pierre Morel
2021-04-06  7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 05/16] s390x: lib: css: add SCSW ctrl expectations to " Pierre Morel
2021-04-06  7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 06/16] s390x: lib: css: checking I/O errors Pierre Morel
2021-04-06  7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 07/16] s390x: css: testing ssch errors Pierre Morel
2021-04-06  7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 08/16] s390x: css: ssch check for cpa zero Pierre Morel
2021-04-06  7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 09/16] s390x: css: ssch with mis aligned ORB Pierre Morel
2021-04-06  7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 10/16] s390x: css: ssch checking addressing errors Pierre Morel
2021-04-06  7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 11/16] s390x: css: No support for MIDAW Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 15:58   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-07 10:06     ` Pierre Morel
2021-04-07 10:14       ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-06  7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 12/16] s390x: css: Check ORB reserved bits Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 15:51   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-07 10:07     ` Pierre Morel
2021-04-07 10:15       ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-06  7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 13/16] s390x: css: checking for CSS extensions Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 15:50   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-07 10:42     ` Pierre Morel
2021-04-06  7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 14/16] s390x: css: issuing SSCH when the channel is status pending Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 15:34   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-07 10:46     ` Pierre Morel
2021-04-06  7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 15/16] s390x: css: testing halt subchannel Pierre Morel
2021-04-06  7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 16/16] s390x: css: testing clear subchannel Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 12:21 ` Pierre Morel [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0cee034e-5345-e308-4efb-8c01d94fb74e@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox