From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/10] KVM: s390: Extend MEM_OP ioctl by storage key checked cmpxchg
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 10:38:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10ba824d-6174-2fc4-b58b-a914cc5524be@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230110202632.2533978-2-scgl@linux.ibm.com>
On 1/10/23 21:26, Janis Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
> User space can use the MEM_OP ioctl to make storage key checked reads
> and writes to the guest, however, it has no way of performing atomic,
> key checked, accesses to the guest.
> Extend the MEM_OP ioctl in order to allow for this, by adding a cmpxchg
> mode. For now, support this mode for absolute accesses only.
>
> This mode can be use, for example, to set the device-state-change
> indicator and the adapter-local-summary indicator atomically.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 7 +++
> arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h | 3 ++
> arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 41 +++++++++++++++-
> 4 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> index 55155e262646..452f43c1cc34 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> @@ -583,6 +583,8 @@ struct kvm_s390_mem_op {
> struct {
> __u8 ar; /* the access register number */
> __u8 key; /* access key, ignored if flag unset */
> + __u8 pad1[6]; /* ignored */
> + __u64 old_addr; /* ignored if flag unset */
These 3 are only used for flag values >=4, no?
They aren't used for all flag values but for specific ones, right?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-11 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-10 20:26 [PATCH v5 00/10] KVM: s390: Extend MEM_OP ioctl by storage key checked cmpxchg Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-10 20:26 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] " Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-11 7:59 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-11 10:00 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-11 10:21 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-11 9:35 ` Janosch Frank
2023-01-11 15:19 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-11 17:26 ` Janosch Frank
2023-01-12 12:48 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-11 9:38 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2023-01-11 15:29 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-10 20:26 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] Documentation: KVM: s390: Describe KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_CMPXCHG Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-10 20:26 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Pass mop_desc via pointer Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-10 20:26 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Replace macros by functions Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-10 20:26 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Move testlist into main Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-10 20:26 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Add cmpxchg tests Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-10 20:26 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Add bad address test Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-10 20:26 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Fix typo Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-10 20:26 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Fix wrong address being used in test Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-10 20:26 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Fix integer literal Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v5 00/10] KVM: s390: Extend MEM_OP ioctl by storage key checked cmpxchg Janosch Frank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=10ba824d-6174-2fc4-b58b-a914cc5524be@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=scgl@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox