From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@nigel.suspend2.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] KVM: Host suspend/resume support
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 08:20:49 +1100
Message-ID: <1170192049.4308.16.camel@nigel.suspend2.net>
References: <45BF5B96.1070007@qumranet.com>
	 <20070130145717.00D1BA0014@il.qumranet.com>
Reply-To: nigel@nigel.suspend2.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	akpm@osdl.org, mingo@elte.hu
To: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S1751460AbXA3VUx@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070130145717.00D1BA0014@il.qumranet.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

Hi.

On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 14:57 +0000, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Add the necessary callbacks to suspend and resume a host running kvm.  This
> is just a repeat of the cpu hotplug/unplug work.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>

Maybe it's just a lack of understanding, but I'm wondering if this patch
is necessary - we already hot-unplug secondary cpus prior to suspending
devices.

Regards,

Nigel