From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: KVM performance Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:54:29 +1100 Message-ID: <1170208469.17669.26.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1169857267.30807.44.camel@localhost.localdomain> <45BB0E85.9060303@qumranet.com> <1169902138.32208.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> <45BC6F98.908@qumranet.com> <1170161536.17669.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> <45BF4082.3010803@qumranet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, tim.c.chen-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org To: Avi Kivity Return-path: In-Reply-To: <45BF4082.3010803-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 14:56 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > Another optimization is that we can stop having two parallel > implementations of the same code. I suggest we start thinking how to merge. KVM has more ambition than lguest, so I was planning on letting you do all the hard work then rebase my code on top once the mmu branch hits mainline 8) I've grabbed the release SVN tree and will look through it to see how it'll fit... (lguest's page_table.c is only 450 lines, BUT I doubt it would stay that way if I implemented a decent one 8) Cheers, Rusty. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV