public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Olney <aolney-lg4TTeReta+Vc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: XP installation speed: KVM vs Xen
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:16:17 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1172679377.5261.38.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45E52AEE.6030107-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>

I'd almost swear that KVM is faster with an XP raw image that was
installed by Xen, than it is with a raw image installed by KVM.

On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 09:10 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Andrew Olney wrote:
> > I've been migrating from Xen to KVM for a wide variety of reasons.
> >
> > I've noticed, however, that XP installs much much faster with Xen (3.03
> > xen-image-xen0-2.6.17-6-generic-xen0 ubuntu) than with KVM (14).
> >   
> 
> 
> btw, as both Xen and kvm use qemu, Xen full virtualization images should 
> work without change in kvm.
> 
> 
> 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-02-28 16:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-27 20:46 XP installation speed: KVM vs Xen Andrew Olney
     [not found] ` <1172609205.6539.9.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2007-02-28  0:05   ` Andreas Hasenack
     [not found]     ` <200702272105.18311.ahasenack-y7mWNqJcIDpfJ/NunPodnw@public.gmane.org>
2007-02-28  0:06       ` Anthony Liguori
2007-02-28  0:09   ` Anthony Liguori
2007-02-28  7:02   ` Avi Kivity
2007-02-28  7:10   ` Avi Kivity
     [not found]     ` <45E52AEE.6030107-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2007-02-28 16:16       ` Andrew Olney [this message]
     [not found]         ` <1172679377.5261.38.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2007-02-28 16:40           ` Avi Kivity
     [not found]             ` <45E5B07A.3040700-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2007-02-28 18:10               ` Andrew Olney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1172679377.5261.38.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=aolney-lg4ttereta+vc3sceru5cw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox