public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hollis Blanchard <hollis-yUx37fBWTUITNcAmw9vGhQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: kvm_regs vs kvm_sregs?
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:17:28 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1174612648.5036.5.camel@diesel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45FCCA6D.3070207-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>

On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 07:13 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > What is the distinction between kvm_regs and kvm_sregs? As far as I can
> > see, kvm_regs is only used when emulating IO, emulating MMIO, and
> > emulating CPUID, where guest GPRs are directly modified. kvm_sregs is
> > only used for full CPU state save (for later restore).
> >   
> 
> After the userspace interface changes, neither of them are used except 
> for migration, savevm/loadvm, and debugging. Theoretically they could be 
> unified, practically SET_SREGS is a dangerous operation on Intel cpus 
> due to kvm's very imperfect real mode support.
> 
> > When the kernel had to use copy_to_user() to transfer state to userland,
> > I can see that this split resulted in less memory copying. However, now
> > that userland can directly map register state without a copy, why not
> > combine the two structures?
> >   
> 
> We don't map the register state as that would require us to sync it on 
> every exit.
> 
> > I guess it takes longer to copy state out of the VMCS into kvm_sregs, so
> > why bother if userspace isn't going to use it?
> >   
> 
> When it's needed, it's really needed.  Or did I misunderstand the question?

I guess I misunderstood. I thought the mmap was for userspace to access
kvm_regs, which previously was needed when emulating IO.

Apparently this is no longer the case: instead the data is copied
somewhere into mmap space and then complete_pio() is responsible for
loading that raw data into the guest register state.

Seems a bit more convoluted, but I guess you've managed to divorce user
and kernel data structures, if that was the goal.

-Hollis


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV

      parent reply	other threads:[~2007-03-23  1:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-16 15:00 kvm_regs vs kvm_sregs? Hollis Blanchard
2007-03-18  5:13 ` Avi Kivity
     [not found]   ` <45FCCA6D.3070207-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2007-03-23  1:17     ` Hollis Blanchard [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1174612648.5036.5.camel@diesel \
    --to=hollis-yux37fbwtuitncamw9vghq@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox