From: Hollis Blanchard <hollis-yUx37fBWTUITNcAmw9vGhQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: kvm_regs vs kvm_sregs?
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:17:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1174612648.5036.5.camel@diesel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45FCCA6D.3070207-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 07:13 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > What is the distinction between kvm_regs and kvm_sregs? As far as I can
> > see, kvm_regs is only used when emulating IO, emulating MMIO, and
> > emulating CPUID, where guest GPRs are directly modified. kvm_sregs is
> > only used for full CPU state save (for later restore).
> >
>
> After the userspace interface changes, neither of them are used except
> for migration, savevm/loadvm, and debugging. Theoretically they could be
> unified, practically SET_SREGS is a dangerous operation on Intel cpus
> due to kvm's very imperfect real mode support.
>
> > When the kernel had to use copy_to_user() to transfer state to userland,
> > I can see that this split resulted in less memory copying. However, now
> > that userland can directly map register state without a copy, why not
> > combine the two structures?
> >
>
> We don't map the register state as that would require us to sync it on
> every exit.
>
> > I guess it takes longer to copy state out of the VMCS into kvm_sregs, so
> > why bother if userspace isn't going to use it?
> >
>
> When it's needed, it's really needed. Or did I misunderstand the question?
I guess I misunderstood. I thought the mmap was for userspace to access
kvm_regs, which previously was needed when emulating IO.
Apparently this is no longer the case: instead the data is copied
somewhere into mmap space and then complete_pio() is responsible for
loading that raw data into the guest register state.
Seems a bit more convoluted, but I guess you've managed to divorce user
and kernel data structures, if that was the goal.
-Hollis
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-23 1:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-16 15:00 kvm_regs vs kvm_sregs? Hollis Blanchard
2007-03-18 5:13 ` Avi Kivity
[not found] ` <45FCCA6D.3070207-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2007-03-23 1:17 ` Hollis Blanchard [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1174612648.5036.5.camel@diesel \
--to=hollis-yux37fbwtuitncamw9vghq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox