From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: virtio & hypercall interface? Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 07:26:58 +1000 Message-ID: <1189718818.32322.41.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1189664514.32322.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> <46E98DC0.3050509@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: In-Reply-To: <46E98DC0.3050509-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 14:21 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Rusty Russell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've finally started looking at Dor's git tree, and it struck me that > > it conflicts with Anthony's hypercall patches. FWIW I like Anthony's > > patching thing, and don't really care about arg order. > > Are you trying to implement cpuid in assembly in the monitor? > Otherwise, I don't see why arg order would matter. I'm using x86_emulate_cpuid(). And I'm lazy. Rusty. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/