From: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
kvm-ppc-devel
<kvm-ppc-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>,
"Zhang,
Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Split kvm_vcpu to support new archs.
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:18:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1193080681.27520.32.camel@basalt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <471AF450.9040202-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 08:40 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> The usage of the macro is only for an intermediate stage, so this
> patch shows the changes in the data structures, while the next one
> will be littered with code changes due to the changes in the way
> fields are addressed.
OK.
What is the plan here Xiantao? If I want to begin PPC integration,
should I submit some patches too (hopefully in areas where we will not
conflict)? Or should I just review your submissions and hold off on PPC
code changes until the dust settles?
> I was initially in favor of doing
>
> struct kvm_vcpu {
> struct kvm_vcpu_common common;
> ...
> };
>
> in order to avoid the majority of fields requiring an 'arch.' prefix
> (most fields are arch dependent, very few are common), but using
> container_of() as someone suggested seems to be a better idea.
Note: container_of() enables the above layout, and I agree with that
approach. To avoid misunderstandings, this is what we're talking about:
kvm_common_foo(struct kvm_vcpu_common *vcpu)
{
kvm_arch_foo(vcpu);
}
kvm_common_bar(struct kvm_vcpu_common *vcpu)
{
...
}
----------
struct kvm_vcpu_ppc440 {
struct kvm_vcpu_common common;
u32 gpr[32];
};
#define to_ppc440(v) container_of(...)
kvm_arch_foo(struct kvm_vcpu_common *vcpu)
{
struct kvm_vcpu_ppc440 *ppc440 = to_ppc440(vcpu);
ppc440->gpr[3] = 0;
kvm_common_bar(ppc440->common);
}
I've chosen specific PPC names since I expect to support more than one
PowerPC processor type simultaneously, e.g. "modprobe kvm-powerpc-440
kvm-powerpc-e500". (This will require some additional "kvm_ppc_ops"
support not shown here.)
Personally I think "common" is too much typing, but I've left the name
as you suggested for now. :)
--
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-22 19:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-18 7:34 [PATCH] Split kvm_vcpu to support new archs Zhang, Xiantao
[not found] ` <42DFA526FC41B1429CE7279EF83C6BDC809A6A-wq7ZOvIWXbMAbVU2wMM1CrfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-18 14:22 ` Avi Kivity
2007-10-18 20:01 ` Hollis Blanchard
2007-10-18 21:04 ` Anthony Liguori
[not found] ` <4717CA4B.7040307-rdkfGonbjUSkNkDKm+mE6A@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-18 21:14 ` Hollis Blanchard
2007-10-18 21:31 ` Anthony Liguori
[not found] ` <4717D095.40708-rdkfGonbjUSkNkDKm+mE6A@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-18 21:43 ` [kvm-ppc-devel] " Hollis Blanchard
2007-10-18 22:04 ` Anthony Liguori
[not found] ` <4717D87E.5010000-rdkfGonbjUSkNkDKm+mE6A@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-19 17:16 ` Hollis Blanchard
2007-10-19 13:34 ` Carsten Otte
2007-10-21 6:40 ` Avi Kivity
[not found] ` <471AF450.9040202-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-22 19:18 ` Hollis Blanchard [this message]
2007-10-23 12:14 ` Carsten Otte
[not found] ` <471DE5B2.4030709-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-24 11:44 ` Zhang, Xiantao
2007-10-25 2:56 ` Jerone Young
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1193080681.27520.32.camel@basalt \
--to=hollisb-r/jw6+rmf7hqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kvm-ppc-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=xiantao.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox