public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
	kvm-ppc-devel
	<kvm-ppc-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>,
	"Zhang,
	 Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Split kvm_vcpu to support new archs.
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:18:01 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1193080681.27520.32.camel@basalt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <471AF450.9040202-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>

On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 08:40 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> 
> The usage of the macro is only for an intermediate stage, so this
> patch shows the changes in the data structures, while the next one
> will be littered with code changes due to the changes in the way
> fields are addressed.

OK.

What is the plan here Xiantao? If I want to begin PPC integration,
should I submit some patches too (hopefully in areas where we will not
conflict)? Or should I just review your submissions and hold off on PPC
code changes until the dust settles?

> I was initially in favor of doing
> 
>     struct kvm_vcpu {
>         struct kvm_vcpu_common common;
>         ...
>     };
> 
> in order to avoid the majority of fields requiring an 'arch.' prefix 
> (most fields are arch dependent, very few are common), but using 
> container_of() as someone suggested seems to be a better idea. 

Note: container_of() enables the above layout, and I agree with that
approach. To avoid misunderstandings, this is what we're talking about:
        
        kvm_common_foo(struct kvm_vcpu_common *vcpu)
        {
        	kvm_arch_foo(vcpu);
        }
        
        kvm_common_bar(struct kvm_vcpu_common *vcpu)
        {
        	...
        }
        
        ----------
        
        struct kvm_vcpu_ppc440 {
        	struct kvm_vcpu_common common;
        	u32 gpr[32];
        };
        
        #define to_ppc440(v) container_of(...)
        
        kvm_arch_foo(struct kvm_vcpu_common *vcpu)
        {
        	struct kvm_vcpu_ppc440 *ppc440 = to_ppc440(vcpu);
        
        	ppc440->gpr[3] = 0;
        
        	kvm_common_bar(ppc440->common);
        }
        
I've chosen specific PPC names since I expect to support more than one
PowerPC processor type simultaneously, e.g. "modprobe kvm-powerpc-440
kvm-powerpc-e500". (This will require some additional "kvm_ppc_ops"
support not shown here.)

Personally I think "common" is too much typing, but I've left the name
as you suggested for now. :)

-- 
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-10-22 19:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-18  7:34 [PATCH] Split kvm_vcpu to support new archs Zhang, Xiantao
     [not found] ` <42DFA526FC41B1429CE7279EF83C6BDC809A6A-wq7ZOvIWXbMAbVU2wMM1CrfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-18 14:22   ` Avi Kivity
2007-10-18 20:01   ` Hollis Blanchard
2007-10-18 21:04     ` Anthony Liguori
     [not found]       ` <4717CA4B.7040307-rdkfGonbjUSkNkDKm+mE6A@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-18 21:14         ` Hollis Blanchard
2007-10-18 21:31           ` Anthony Liguori
     [not found]             ` <4717D095.40708-rdkfGonbjUSkNkDKm+mE6A@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-18 21:43               ` [kvm-ppc-devel] " Hollis Blanchard
2007-10-18 22:04                 ` Anthony Liguori
     [not found]                   ` <4717D87E.5010000-rdkfGonbjUSkNkDKm+mE6A@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-19 17:16                     ` Hollis Blanchard
2007-10-19 13:34                 ` Carsten Otte
2007-10-21  6:40     ` Avi Kivity
     [not found]       ` <471AF450.9040202-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-22 19:18         ` Hollis Blanchard [this message]
2007-10-23 12:14           ` Carsten Otte
     [not found]             ` <471DE5B2.4030709-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-24 11:44               ` Zhang, Xiantao
2007-10-25  2:56           ` Jerone Young

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1193080681.27520.32.camel@basalt \
    --to=hollisb-r/jw6+rmf7hqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kvm-ppc-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=xiantao.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox