Re: [PATCH]3/5 Using kvm_arch prefix to define functions, and replace

[Hollis Blanchard <hollisb-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]

On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 15:21 +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> @@ -890,7 +890,7 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu(struct kvm
> *kvm,
> int n)
>         if (!valid_vcpu(n))
>                 return -EINVAL;
>  
> -       vcpu = kvm_x86_ops->vcpu_create(kvm, n);
> +       vcpu = kvm_arch_vcpu_create(kvm, n);
>         if (IS_ERR(vcpu))
>                 return PTR_ERR(vcpu);
>  
> @@ -900,7 +900,7 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu(struct kvm
> *kvm,
> int n)
>         BUG_ON((unsigned long)&vcpu->host_fx_image & 0xF);
>  
>         vcpu_load(vcpu);
> -       r = kvm_x86_ops->vcpu_reset(vcpu);
> +       r = kvm_arch_vcpu_reset(vcpu);
>         if (r == 0)
>                 r = kvm_mmu_setup(vcpu);
>         vcpu_put(vcpu);
> @@ -933,7 +933,7 @@ mmu_unload:
>         vcpu_put(vcpu);
>  
>  free_vcpu:
> -       kvm_x86_ops->vcpu_free(vcpu);
> +       kvm_arch_vcpu_free(vcpu);
>         return r;
>  }

Have a look at the patch I posted on Wednesday: "[PATCH 2 of 2] RFC:
Create kvm_arch_vcpu_create()". kvm_arch_vcpu_create() will actually
encompass more logic from kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu(), and once you do
that, kvm_arch_vcpu_reset() doesn't need to exist (which will also make
Carsten happy).

-- 
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/