From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hollis Blanchard Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC] Proposed new directory layout for kvm and virtualization Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:26:32 -0600 Message-ID: <1197397592.9632.26.camel@basalt> References: <475E5CBB.9080608@qumranet.com> <20071211161032.GA25769@uranus.ravnborg.org> <475EB7AC.9040903@qumranet.com> <20071211173717.GA26368@uranus.ravnborg.org> <475ECC04.8000609@qumranet.com> Reply-To: Hollis Blanchard Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Sam Ravnborg , kvm-devel , linux-kernel To: Avi Kivity Return-path: In-Reply-To: <475ECC04.8000609@qumranet.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 19:42 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > > > Are there any dependencies between the arch and non-arch files > > such as they are combined in a single module? > > Yes, they are combined into a single module. > > In the case of x86, some of arch/x86/... will be combined with > virt/kvm/ to form kvm.ko, while others will generate kvm-intel.ko and > kvm-amd.ko. Also, asm-offsets is a major sticking point. Either we create a dependency on arch/*/kernel/asm-offsets.c, or we find a way to create a new arch/*/virt/asm-offsets.c file. -- Hollis Blanchard IBM Linux Technology Center