public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>,
	Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>,
	Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] KVM: SVM: Use guard(mutex) to simplify SNP vCPU state updates
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 16:57:12 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <11daeb05-b33d-01a4-e84d-40148943910f@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250219012705.1495231-10-seanjc@google.com>

On 2/18/25 19:27, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Use guard(mutex) in sev_snp_init_protected_guest_state() and pull in its
> lock-protected inner helper.  Without an unlock trampoline (and even with
> one), there is no real need for an inner helper.  Eliminating the helper
> also avoids having to fixup the open coded "lockdep" WARN_ON().
> 
> Opportunistically drop the error message if KVM can't obtain the pfn for
> the new target VMSA.  The error message provides zero information that
> can't be gleaned from the fact that the vCPU is stuck.

Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>

> 
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 122 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> index 3a531232c3a1..15c324b61b24 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> @@ -3839,11 +3839,26 @@ static int snp_begin_psc(struct vcpu_svm *svm, struct psc_buffer *psc)
>  	BUG();
>  }
>  
> -static int __sev_snp_update_protected_guest_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +/*
> + * Invoked as part of svm_vcpu_reset() processing of an init event.
> + */
> +void sev_snp_init_protected_guest_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
> +	struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
> +	struct page *page;
> +	kvm_pfn_t pfn;
> +	gfn_t gfn;
>  
> -	WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&svm->sev_es.snp_vmsa_mutex));
> +	if (!sev_snp_guest(vcpu->kvm))
> +		return;
> +
> +	guard(mutex)(&svm->sev_es.snp_vmsa_mutex);
> +
> +	if (!svm->sev_es.snp_ap_waiting_for_reset)
> +		return;
> +
> +	svm->sev_es.snp_ap_waiting_for_reset = false;
>  
>  	/* Mark the vCPU as offline and not runnable */
>  	vcpu->arch.pv.pv_unhalted = false;
> @@ -3858,78 +3873,47 @@ static int __sev_snp_update_protected_guest_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	 */
>  	vmcb_mark_all_dirty(svm->vmcb);
>  
> -	if (VALID_PAGE(svm->sev_es.snp_vmsa_gpa)) {
> -		gfn_t gfn = gpa_to_gfn(svm->sev_es.snp_vmsa_gpa);
> -		struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
> -		struct page *page;
> -		kvm_pfn_t pfn;
> -
> -		slot = gfn_to_memslot(vcpu->kvm, gfn);
> -		if (!slot)
> -			return -EINVAL;
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * The new VMSA will be private memory guest memory, so
> -		 * retrieve the PFN from the gmem backend.
> -		 */
> -		if (kvm_gmem_get_pfn(vcpu->kvm, slot, gfn, &pfn, &page, NULL))
> -			return -EINVAL;
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * From this point forward, the VMSA will always be a
> -		 * guest-mapped page rather than the initial one allocated
> -		 * by KVM in svm->sev_es.vmsa. In theory, svm->sev_es.vmsa
> -		 * could be free'd and cleaned up here, but that involves
> -		 * cleanups like wbinvd_on_all_cpus() which would ideally
> -		 * be handled during teardown rather than guest boot.
> -		 * Deferring that also allows the existing logic for SEV-ES
> -		 * VMSAs to be re-used with minimal SNP-specific changes.
> -		 */
> -		svm->sev_es.snp_has_guest_vmsa = true;
> -
> -		/* Use the new VMSA */
> -		svm->vmcb->control.vmsa_pa = pfn_to_hpa(pfn);
> -
> -		/* Mark the vCPU as runnable */
> -		kvm_set_mp_state(vcpu, KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE);
> -
> -		svm->sev_es.snp_vmsa_gpa = INVALID_PAGE;
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * gmem pages aren't currently migratable, but if this ever
> -		 * changes then care should be taken to ensure
> -		 * svm->sev_es.vmsa is pinned through some other means.
> -		 */
> -		kvm_release_page_clean(page);
> -	}
> -
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * Invoked as part of svm_vcpu_reset() processing of an init event.
> - */
> -void sev_snp_init_protected_guest_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> -{
> -	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	if (!sev_snp_guest(vcpu->kvm))
> +	if (!VALID_PAGE(svm->sev_es.snp_vmsa_gpa))
>  		return;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&svm->sev_es.snp_vmsa_mutex);
> +	gfn = gpa_to_gfn(svm->sev_es.snp_vmsa_gpa);
>  
> -	if (!svm->sev_es.snp_ap_waiting_for_reset)
> -		goto unlock;
> -
> -	svm->sev_es.snp_ap_waiting_for_reset = false;
> +	slot = gfn_to_memslot(vcpu->kvm, gfn);
> +	if (!slot)
> +		return;
>  
> -	ret = __sev_snp_update_protected_guest_state(vcpu);
> -	if (ret)
> -		vcpu_unimpl(vcpu, "snp: AP state update on init failed\n");
> +	/*
> +	 * The new VMSA will be private memory guest memory, so retrieve the
> +	 * PFN from the gmem backend.
> +	 */
> +	if (kvm_gmem_get_pfn(vcpu->kvm, slot, gfn, &pfn, &page, NULL))
> +		return;
>  
> -unlock:
> -	mutex_unlock(&svm->sev_es.snp_vmsa_mutex);
> +	/*
> +	 * From this point forward, the VMSA will always be a guest-mapped page
> +	 * rather than the initial one allocated by KVM in svm->sev_es.vmsa. In
> +	 * theory, svm->sev_es.vmsa could be free'd and cleaned up here, but
> +	 * that involves cleanups like wbinvd_on_all_cpus() which would ideally
> +	 * be handled during teardown rather than guest boot.  Deferring that
> +	 * also allows the existing logic for SEV-ES VMSAs to be re-used with
> +	 * minimal SNP-specific changes.
> +	 */
> +	svm->sev_es.snp_has_guest_vmsa = true;
> +
> +	/* Use the new VMSA */
> +	svm->vmcb->control.vmsa_pa = pfn_to_hpa(pfn);
> +
> +	/* Mark the vCPU as runnable */
> +	kvm_set_mp_state(vcpu, KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE);
> +
> +	svm->sev_es.snp_vmsa_gpa = INVALID_PAGE;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * gmem pages aren't currently migratable, but if this ever changes
> +	 * then care should be taken to ensure svm->sev_es.vmsa is pinned
> +	 * through some other means.
> +	 */
> +	kvm_release_page_clean(page);
>  }
>  
>  static int sev_snp_ap_creation(struct vcpu_svm *svm)

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-24 22:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-19  1:26 [PATCH 00/10] KVM: SVM: Attempt to cleanup SEV_FEATURES Sean Christopherson
2025-02-19  1:26 ` [PATCH 01/10] KVM: SVM: Save host DR masks but NOT DRs on CPUs with DebugSwap Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 19:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2025-02-25  2:22   ` Kim Phillips
2025-02-25 14:12     ` Tom Lendacky
2025-02-19  1:26 ` [PATCH 02/10] KVM: SVM: Don't rely on DebugSwap to restore host DR0..DR3 Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 20:32   ` Tom Lendacky
2025-02-24 22:32     ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-19  1:26 ` [PATCH 03/10] KVM: SVM: Terminate the VM if a SEV-ES+ guest is run with an invalid VMSA Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 21:03   ` Tom Lendacky
2025-02-24 22:55     ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 23:55       ` Tom Lendacky
2025-02-25  0:54         ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-25  1:20           ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-25 14:42           ` Tom Lendacky
2025-02-19  1:26 ` [PATCH 04/10] KVM: SVM: Don't change target vCPU state on AP Creation VMGEXIT error Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 21:31   ` Tom Lendacky
2025-02-19  1:27 ` [PATCH 05/10] KVM: SVM: Require AP's "requested" SEV_FEATURES to match KVM's view Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 21:46   ` Tom Lendacky
2025-02-19  1:27 ` [PATCH 06/10] KVM: SVM: Simplify request+kick logic in SNP AP Creation handling Sean Christopherson
2025-02-19  6:19   ` Gupta, Pankaj
2025-02-24 21:48   ` Tom Lendacky
2025-02-19  1:27 ` [PATCH 07/10] KVM: SVM: Use guard(mutex) to simplify SNP AP Creation error handling Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 21:49   ` Tom Lendacky
2025-02-19  1:27 ` [PATCH 08/10] KVM: SVM: Mark VMCB dirty before processing incoming snp_vmsa_gpa Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 21:58   ` Tom Lendacky
2025-02-19  1:27 ` [PATCH 09/10] KVM: SVM: Use guard(mutex) to simplify SNP vCPU state updates Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 22:57   ` Tom Lendacky [this message]
2025-02-19  1:27 ` [PATCH 10/10] KVM: SVM: Invalidate "next" SNP VMSA GPA even on failure Sean Christopherson
2025-02-25  0:00   ` Tom Lendacky
2025-02-20 22:51 ` [PATCH 00/10] KVM: SVM: Attempt to cleanup SEV_FEATURES Tom Lendacky
2025-02-25  0:02   ` Tom Lendacky
2025-02-25  2:21     ` Kim Phillips

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=11daeb05-b33d-01a4-e84d-40148943910f@amd.com \
    --to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=aik@amd.com \
    --cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=naveen@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox