From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hollis Blanchard Subject: Re: [PATCH][QEMU] Use a separate device for in-kernel PIT Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:20:00 -0500 Message-ID: <1206130800.3136.39.camel@basalt> References: <1205343520-11789-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> Reply-To: Hollis Blanchard Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, kvm-ppc-devel , Avi Kivity To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1205343520-11789-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 12:38 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Part of the feedback we received from Fabrice about the KVM patches > for QEMU > is that we should create a separate device for the in-kernel APIC to > avoid > having lots of if (kvm_enabled()) within the APIC code that were > difficult to > understand why there were needed. > > This patch separates the in-kernel PIT into a separate device. It > also > introduces some configure logic to only compile in support for the > in-kernel > PIT if it's available. > > The result of this is that we now only need a single if > (kvm_enabled()) to > determine which device to use. Besides making it more upstream > friendly, I > think this makes the code much easier to understand. > > Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori This patch solves annoying qemu build breakage hitting PowerPC around struct kvm_pit_state, so that's another vote in favor... -- Hollis Blanchard IBM Linux Technology Center ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/