From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jerone Young Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] [kvm-userspace][test] consolidate test libs to libcflat Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:12:08 -0500 Message-ID: <1214493128.8513.1.camel@thinkpadL> References: <1214429262.1746.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> Reply-To: jyoung5@us.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org To: Hollis Blanchard Return-path: Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.151]:53192 "EHLO e33.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759894AbYFZPMP (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:12:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1214429262.1746.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 16:27 -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 15:39 -0500, Jerone Young wrote: > > This set of patches are to consolidate test libraries into a single > > library archive. This lib archive is libcflat. This will allow common > > code to be shared among archs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jerone Young > > I think patches 1-3 should be combined. I was told by someone that when these patches were combined .. they where too big. Also these bisect easily and don't break from patch to patch. Which is why they are phased in. > > By the way, I assume you've built x86 with these changes, but have you > run it too? Yes, with these patches x86 tests compile and run fine. >