public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Bernhard Schmidt <berni@birkenwald.de>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Freeze with KVM_CLOCK, undocumented dependency VIRTIO_BLK -> VIRTIO_PCI
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 11:11:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1214993464.13909.7.camel@muff> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <485DBBCD.5060600@codemonkey.ws>

On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 21:41 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Bernhard Schmidt wrote:

> > b) apparently VIRTIO_BLK works only when VIRTIO_PCI and thus PCI is
> > enabled in the kernel. Otherwise the vda* device is not visible and the
> > guest does not find its root filesystem.
> >
> > Is this expected? If yes, is it possible to add the appropriate
> > dependency in the kernel configuration or amend the description
> > accordingly?
> >   
> 
> VIRTIO_BLK doesn't depend on VIRTIO_PCI.  VIRTIO_PCI allows you use to 
> virtio devices under KVM.
> 
> This is all documented FWIW in the Kconfig and in a number of places on 
> the wiki.

I wonder would it be useful to default to building in (i.e. not as a
module) virtio_pci if building with e.g. KVM_GUEST?

There's two issues here:

  1) It's easy to forget about virtio_pci - if we used KVM_GUEST as a 
     general "this kernel may be run on KVM" config, then it would be a 
     good hint that virtio_pci should be built

  2) Although we currently build virtio_pci as a module in Fedora, it 
     leads to a pretty strange situation where e.g. mkinitrd and 
     anaconda need to explicitly include the virtio_pci module; I 
     don't think there's analogous situation where bus probing logic is 
     in a module rather than built into the kernel

Cheers,
Mark.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-07-02 10:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-21 14:54 Freeze with KVM_CLOCK, undocumented dependency VIRTIO_BLK -> VIRTIO_PCI Bernhard Schmidt
2008-06-22  2:41 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-06-22 23:22   ` Bernhard Schmidt
2008-07-04  9:27     ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-07-02 10:11   ` Mark McLoughlin [this message]
2008-07-03 14:03     ` Avi Kivity
2008-07-03 14:44       ` Mark McLoughlin
2008-07-03 14:49         ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1214993464.13909.7.camel@muff \
    --to=markmc@redhat.com \
    --cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=berni@birkenwald.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox