From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Bernhard Schmidt <berni@birkenwald.de>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Freeze with KVM_CLOCK, undocumented dependency VIRTIO_BLK -> VIRTIO_PCI
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 11:11:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1214993464.13909.7.camel@muff> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <485DBBCD.5060600@codemonkey.ws>
On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 21:41 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> > b) apparently VIRTIO_BLK works only when VIRTIO_PCI and thus PCI is
> > enabled in the kernel. Otherwise the vda* device is not visible and the
> > guest does not find its root filesystem.
> >
> > Is this expected? If yes, is it possible to add the appropriate
> > dependency in the kernel configuration or amend the description
> > accordingly?
> >
>
> VIRTIO_BLK doesn't depend on VIRTIO_PCI. VIRTIO_PCI allows you use to
> virtio devices under KVM.
>
> This is all documented FWIW in the Kconfig and in a number of places on
> the wiki.
I wonder would it be useful to default to building in (i.e. not as a
module) virtio_pci if building with e.g. KVM_GUEST?
There's two issues here:
1) It's easy to forget about virtio_pci - if we used KVM_GUEST as a
general "this kernel may be run on KVM" config, then it would be a
good hint that virtio_pci should be built
2) Although we currently build virtio_pci as a module in Fedora, it
leads to a pretty strange situation where e.g. mkinitrd and
anaconda need to explicitly include the virtio_pci module; I
don't think there's analogous situation where bus probing logic is
in a module rather than built into the kernel
Cheers,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-02 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-21 14:54 Freeze with KVM_CLOCK, undocumented dependency VIRTIO_BLK -> VIRTIO_PCI Bernhard Schmidt
2008-06-22 2:41 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-06-22 23:22 ` Bernhard Schmidt
2008-07-04 9:27 ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-07-02 10:11 ` Mark McLoughlin [this message]
2008-07-03 14:03 ` Avi Kivity
2008-07-03 14:44 ` Mark McLoughlin
2008-07-03 14:49 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1214993464.13909.7.camel@muff \
--to=markmc@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=berni@birkenwald.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox