From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hollis Blanchard Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] kvmtrace: make cycle calculation architecture aware Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 10:03:19 -0500 Message-ID: <1215615799.22935.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1215439013-11480-1-git-send-email-ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1215439013-11480-3-git-send-email-ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1215448660.11175.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4874821F.4060509@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cotte@de.ibm.com, xiantao.zhang@intel.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, avi@qumranet.com, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, eric.e.liu@intel.com To: Christian Ehrhardt Return-path: Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.150]:39420 "EHLO e32.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758896AbYGIPDp (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2008 11:03:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4874821F.4060509@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 11:17 +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > > So the question that is left before changing that is, if the original > author had something special in mind chosing cycles here. > I added Eric on CC for that. > > I wait with my resubmission of the patch series until all > architectures agree *hope* on using getnstimeofday() - after an ack > from all sides I would revise my patch series and submit that changes > alltogether. I got an email bounce from Eric the last time I tried to email him, so I'm not sure he's still with Intel. However, I don't think he had any special intention; I think he was just porting xentrace to KVM. -- Hollis Blanchard IBM Linux Technology Center