From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fabian Deutsch Subject: Re: massive performance drop after a while when using virtio nics Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:32:12 +0200 Message-ID: <1220956332.3011.4.camel@decade.local> References: <1219519317.2909.12.camel@decade.local> <1220955720.12615.28.camel@muff> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Mark McLoughlin Return-path: Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:49961 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751973AbYIIKcR (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2008 06:32:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1220955720.12615.28.camel@muff> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am Dienstag, den 09.09.2008, 11:22 +0100 schrieb Mark McLoughlin: > Hi, > > On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 21:21 +0200, Fabian Deutsch wrote: > > Hey. > > > > When running a guest in the following setup, I observ a "massive" > > performance decrease after a couple of gigabytes of transfrerred data. > > > > other guests keep running fine (no regressions) and nothing unusual is > > observed on the host. > > If you do "killall -ALRM qemu-kvm" after the slowdown has occurred, does > it make things speed up again for a while? > It seems so! Fantastic. > If so, the issue is fixed by: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=ba661292a2bc6ddd305a212b0526e5dc22195fe7 > > It also got applied in 2.6.26.3 and 2.6.25.16. > So it was some signaling-bug on the .. client side? Cheers! fabian