From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
To: Ben-Ami Yassour <benami@il.ibm.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Muli Ben-Yehuda <MULI@il.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: virtio performance issue
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 11:49:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1221648582.7508.20.camel@blaa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1221593080.26630.28.camel@cluwyn.haifa.ibm.com>
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 22:24 +0300, Ben-Ami Yassour wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 09:16 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > Ben-Ami Yassour wrote:
> > > I am running virtio with the latest KVM code, and see a significant
> > > performance issue.
> > >
> > > Ping to the host (or any other close machine) reports a 4ms delay.
> > >
> >
> > What kvm version and what host kernel version?
> >
> > It's very easy to mistakenly compile qemu without GSO support too. You
> > have to make sure that the 2.6.27 if_tun.h is being included by QEMU.
>
> Is there an option to control GSO support? How?
GSO support is unconditionally enabled with model=virtio if
kvm-userspace is built with the correct kernel headers, the host kernel
supports tun/tap's IFF_VNET_HDR extension and if the guest supports GSO.
> I am using the kernel and userspace that I pulled from the kvm tree
> today.
>
> Based on your comment, we checked and the build of the userspace does
> not take if_tun.h from the kernel tree, it takes it from the system
> include files.
> The reason was that the file was not copied as part of the userspace
> build.
>
> To fix this we made the following change:
> diff --git a/kernel/Makefile b/kernel/Makefile
> index 3f5f6da..b81b098 100644
> --- a/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ T = $(subst -sync,,$@)-tmp
> header-sync:
> rm -rf $T
> rsync -R \
> - "$(LINUX)"/./include/linux/kvm*.h \
> + "$(LINUX)"/./include/linux/*.h \
> "$(LINUX)"/./include/asm-*/kvm*.h \
Ouch, looks like we need a fix like this alright - maybe just copy
if_tun.h and virtio*.h ?
> Even with this change and compiling the userspace with the correct
> if_tun.h the results are the same, ping takes 4ms.
GSO shouldn't affect ping latency - it should only affect throughput.
I'd expect ping latency to be in the range of .15ms and .3ms since we
delay our reply for .15ms currently.
Is this a regression? Have you tried bisecting it?
Cheers,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-17 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-16 14:14 virtio performance issue Ben-Ami Yassour
2008-09-16 14:16 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-09-16 19:24 ` Ben-Ami Yassour
2008-09-17 10:49 ` Mark McLoughlin [this message]
2008-09-17 12:10 ` Ben-Ami Yassour
2008-09-16 17:43 ` Bernhard Schmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1221648582.7508.20.camel@blaa \
--to=markmc@redhat.com \
--cc=MULI@il.ibm.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=benami@il.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox