From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Williamson Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] bios: >4G updates Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:17:43 -0600 Message-ID: <1222273063.16470.157.camel@lappy> References: <1222188118.8138.101.camel@2710p.home> <48DA1F6A.40105@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from g1t0029.austin.hp.com ([15.216.28.36]:13581 "EHLO g1t0029.austin.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751234AbYIXQRg (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:17:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <48DA1F6A.40105@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 14:07 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > > The patches all look good, however renaming and reformatting will lead > to merge headaches later on. We haven't been good at working with bochs > bios upstream. > > Can you peek in bochs upstream and see if it's worth merging? If not, > I'll just merge these patches. I'll take a look. It seemed like they added support for putting the ACPI processor objects in an SSDT last I checked, but the AML for their processors is fairly trivial. I'll see if there's anything else worthwhile. Thanks, Alex -- Alex Williamson HP Open Source & Linux Org.