From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hollis Blanchard Subject: regression tests? (was Re: [PATCH] kvm-userspace: move x86 specific calls introduced by device assignement to x86 files) Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 09:18:06 -0600 Message-ID: <1225811886.15410.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <2e906c6317462fb1b551.1225732600@HelionPrime> <49101FB7.3070000@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.143]:60965 "EHLO e3.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753031AbYKDPSJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Nov 2008 10:18:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <49101FB7.3070000@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 12:11 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > Ehrhardt Christian wrote: > > The device asignment patches added the x86 specific ioperm in qemu-kvm. > > This patch moves > > qemu-kvm.c:kvm_do_ioperm() > > to > > qemu-kvm-x86.c:kvm_arch_do_ioperm() > > The patch also changes the qemu-kvm header and the includes according to that. > > > > > > Applied, thanks. Avi, do you have a quick regression test you run before pushing new patches? If so, we'd like to help you add PowerPC to that, if only to detect build breaks like this one. -- Hollis Blanchard IBM Linux Technology Center