From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark McLoughlin Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio: make PCI devices take a virtio_pci module ref Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:36:29 +0000 Message-ID: <1228502189.3858.57.camel@blaa> References: <1228394671.3732.77.camel@blaa> <49385DB7.4060306@gmail.com> <4938EE0B.8020501@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <493929D2.4070900@gmail.com> <1228488921.3858.25.camel@blaa> <49394C1B.2010001@us.ibm.com> Reply-To: Mark McLoughlin Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jiri Slaby , Michael Tokarev , Rusty Russell , linux-kernel , kvm To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:52024 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753418AbYLESh7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2008 13:37:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: <49394C1B.2010001@us.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 09:43 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 14:17 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: > > > > +static void virtio_pci_release_dev(struct device *dev) > > +{ > > +} > > + > > /* A PCI device has it's own struct device and so does a virtio device so > > * we create a place for the virtio devices to show up in sysfs. I think it > > * would make more sense for virtio to not insist on having it's own device. */ > > static struct device virtio_pci_root = { > > .parent = NULL, > > .bus_id = "virtio-pci", > > + .release = virtio_pci_release_dev, > > }; > > > > Actually, we should be able to delete this virtio_pci_root entirely. > The device is a dummy one anyway. Care to recall why it was added initially and what's changed? One side effect of removing it is that each device appears on its own in /sys/devices rather than neatly under /sys/devices/virtio-pci. (And one side effect of that is that the aforementioned Fedora mkinitrd kludge stops working which would make me sad :-) Cheers, mark.