From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] virtio: do not statically allocate root device
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:58:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1228748333.3609.47.camel@blaa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <493D3276.5040506@us.ibm.com>
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 08:43 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > Apparently we shouldn't be statically allocating the root device
> > object, so dynamically allocate it instead.
> >
> > Also add a release() function to avoid this warning:
> >
> > Device 'virtio-pci' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must be fixed
> >
>
> Is it really better to dynamically allocate the root device than
> statically allocate it? Is the advice that we shouldn't statically
> allocate a device really a suggestion that if you're doing that, you're
> using struct device wrong?
There are other statically allocated devices in tree[1]. It seems this
is actively discouraged, though.
AFAICT, the platform_bus device is there for a similar reason to ours -
i.e. to group devices together in sysfs.
> If so, this conversion should be equally wrong. Have you chosen to keep
> this device so that your initrd work-around continues to work as-is?
I choose to keep it because:
a) I'm trying to fix the warning spew from 'rmmod virtio_pci' without
breaking anything else
b) The grouping under /sys/devices/{virtio-pci,lguest,kvm_s390} is
useful IMHO and there are precedents (e.g. /sys/devices/platform)
c) It's better to not gratuitously move stuff around where we know it
will break something
> What exactly is the work around and is there a less hackish way we could
> support it?
Being discussed elsewhere in the thread.
Cheers,
Mark.
[1] - git-grep 'struct device .* = {' next-20081204
next-20081204:arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/iop_fw_load.c:static struct device iop_spu_device[2] = {
next-20081204:arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/iop_fw_load.c:static struct device iop_mpu_device = {
next-20081204:arch/ia64/kernel/pci-dma.c:struct device fallback_dev = {
next-20081204:arch/parisc/kernel/drivers.c:static struct device root = {
next-20081204:arch/powerpc/kernel/ibmebus.c:static struct device ibmebus_bus_device = { /* fake "parent" device */
next-20081204:arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/system-bus.c:static struct device ps3_system_bus = {
next-20081204:arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c:struct device x86_dma_fallback_dev = {
next-20081204:drivers/base/isa.c:static struct device isa_bus = {
next-20081204:drivers/base/platform.c:struct device platform_bus = {
next-20081204:drivers/idle/i7300_idle.c:static struct device dummy_dma_dev = {
next-20081204:drivers/ieee1394/nodemgr.c:static struct device nodemgr_dev_template_ud = {
next-20081204:drivers/ieee1394/nodemgr.c:static struct device nodemgr_dev_template_ne = {
next-20081204:drivers/ieee1394/nodemgr.c:struct device nodemgr_dev_template_host = {
next-20081204:drivers/lguest/lguest_device.c:static struct device lguest_root = {
next-20081204:drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grumain.c:static struct device gru_device = {
next-20081204:drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xp_main.c:struct device xp_dbg_subname = {
next-20081204:drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_main.c:struct device xpc_part_dbg_subname = {
next-20081204:drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_main.c:struct device xpc_chan_dbg_subname = {
next-20081204:drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpnet.c:struct device xpnet_dbg_subname = {
...
next-20081204:drivers/rapidio/rio-driver.c:static struct device rio_bus = {
next-20081204:drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c:static struct device pseudo_primary = {
next-20081204:drivers/sh/maple/maple.c:static struct device maple_bus = {
next-20081204:drivers/sh/superhyway/superhyway.c:static struct device superhyway_bus_device = {
next-20081204:drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c:static struct device virtio_pci_root = {
next-20081204:drivers/w1/w1.c:struct device w1_master_device = {
next-20081204:drivers/w1/w1.c:struct device w1_slave_device = {
next-20081204:samples/firmware_class/firmware_sample_driver.c:static struct device ghost_device = {
next-20081204:samples/firmware_class/firmware_sample_firmware_class.c:static struct device my_device = {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-08 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-04 12:44 [PATCH] virtio: make PCI devices take a virtio_pci module ref Mark McLoughlin
2008-12-04 22:46 ` Jiri Slaby
2008-12-05 9:02 ` Michael Tokarev
2008-12-05 13:17 ` Jiri Slaby
2008-12-05 14:55 ` Mark McLoughlin
2008-12-05 15:25 ` Jiri Slaby
2008-12-05 15:26 ` Greg KH
2008-12-05 18:30 ` Mark McLoughlin
2008-12-05 18:46 ` Greg KH
2008-12-08 11:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] virtio: add PCI device release() function Mark McLoughlin
2008-12-08 11:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] virtio: do not statically allocate root device Mark McLoughlin
2008-12-08 14:43 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-12-08 14:58 ` Mark McLoughlin [this message]
2008-12-05 18:33 ` [PATCH] virtio: make PCI devices take a virtio_pci module ref Mark McLoughlin
2008-12-05 15:43 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-12-05 17:22 ` Jiri Slaby
2008-12-05 18:36 ` Mark McLoughlin
2008-12-05 18:54 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-12-07 8:30 ` Rusty Russell
2008-12-07 13:36 ` Jiri Slaby
2008-12-05 0:13 ` Rusty Russell
2008-12-05 15:07 ` Mark McLoughlin
2008-12-07 8:22 ` Rusty Russell
2008-12-08 13:03 ` Mark McLoughlin
2008-12-08 14:46 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-12-09 16:41 ` Mark McLoughlin
2008-12-09 16:57 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-12-09 18:16 ` Kay Sievers
2008-12-10 9:49 ` Mark McLoughlin
2008-12-10 12:02 ` Kay Sievers
2008-12-09 22:25 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1228748333.3609.47.camel@blaa \
--to=markmc@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).