From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: jeremy@goop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] x86: Consolidate irq stack switching to a single macro
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 16:22:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1230301344-570-3-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1230301344-570-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com>
Instead of scattering the logic around, move all stack switching logic
into a single macro which calls a caller-supplied logic.
This makes changing the logic easier and improves readability.
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S | 59 +++++++++++++++----------------------------
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
index 4d47cb8..4f1a38f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
@@ -315,6 +315,22 @@ ENTRY(native_usergs_sysret64)
CFI_REL_OFFSET r15, R15+\offset
.endm
+ .macro call_in_irqstack func
+ /* Switch to the irq stack, unless already on it, then call func */
+ push %rbp
+ CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET 8
+ mov %rsp,%rbp
+ CFI_DEF_CFA_REGISTER rbp
+ incl %gs:pda_irqcount
+ cmovz %gs:pda_irqstackptr,%rsp
+ EMPTY_FRAME 0
+ call \func
+ leaveq
+ CFI_DEF_CFA_REGISTER rsp
+ CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET -8
+ decl %gs:pda_irqcount
+ .endm
+
/* save partial stack frame */
ENTRY(save_args)
XCPT_FRAME
@@ -336,18 +352,6 @@ ENTRY(save_args)
je 1f
SWAPGS
/*
- * irqcount is used to check if a CPU is already on an interrupt stack
- * or not. While this is essentially redundant with preempt_count it is
- * a little cheaper to use a separate counter in the PDA (short of
- * moving irq_enter into assembly, which would be too much work)
- */
-1: incl %gs:pda_irqcount
- jne 2f
- popq_cfi %rax /* move return address... */
- mov %gs:pda_irqstackptr,%rsp
- EMPTY_FRAME 0
- pushq_cfi %rax /* ... to the new stack */
- /*
* We entered an interrupt context - irqs are off:
*/
2: TRACE_IRQS_OFF
@@ -819,8 +823,7 @@ END(interrupt)
subq $10*8, %rsp
CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET 10*8
call save_args
- PARTIAL_FRAME 0
- call \func
+ call_in_irqstack \func
.endm
/*
@@ -836,7 +839,6 @@ common_interrupt:
ret_from_intr:
DISABLE_INTERRUPTS(CLBR_NONE)
TRACE_IRQS_OFF
- decl %gs:pda_irqcount
leaveq
CFI_DEF_CFA_REGISTER rsp
CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET -8
@@ -1060,7 +1062,7 @@ ENTRY(\sym)
TRACE_IRQS_OFF
movq %rsp,%rdi /* pt_regs pointer */
xorl %esi,%esi /* no error code */
- call \do_sym
+ call_in_irqstack \do_sym
jmp paranoid_exit /* %ebx: no swapgs flag */
CFI_ENDPROC
END(\sym)
@@ -1096,7 +1098,7 @@ ENTRY(\sym)
movq %rsp,%rdi /* pt_regs pointer */
movq ORIG_RAX(%rsp),%rsi /* get error code */
movq $-1,ORIG_RAX(%rsp) /* no syscall to restart */
- call \do_sym
+ call_in_irqstack \do_sym
jmp paranoid_exit /* %ebx: no swapgs flag */
CFI_ENDPROC
END(\sym)
@@ -1239,19 +1241,7 @@ END(kernel_execve)
/* Call softirq on interrupt stack. Interrupts are off. */
ENTRY(call_softirq)
CFI_STARTPROC
- push %rbp
- CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET 8
- CFI_REL_OFFSET rbp,0
- mov %rsp,%rbp
- CFI_DEF_CFA_REGISTER rbp
- incl %gs:pda_irqcount
- cmove %gs:pda_irqstackptr,%rsp
- push %rbp # backlink for old unwinder
- call __do_softirq
- leaveq
- CFI_DEF_CFA_REGISTER rsp
- CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET -8
- decl %gs:pda_irqcount
+ call_in_irqstack __do_softirq
ret
CFI_ENDPROC
END(call_softirq)
@@ -1281,15 +1271,8 @@ ENTRY(xen_do_hypervisor_callback) # do_hypervisor_callback(struct *pt_regs)
movq %rdi, %rsp # we don't return, adjust the stack frame
CFI_ENDPROC
DEFAULT_FRAME
-11: incl %gs:pda_irqcount
- movq %rsp,%rbp
- CFI_DEF_CFA_REGISTER rbp
- cmovzq %gs:pda_irqstackptr,%rsp
- pushq %rbp # backlink for old unwinder
- call xen_evtchn_do_upcall
- popq %rsp
+ call_in_irqstack xen_evtchn_do_upcall
CFI_DEF_CFA_REGISTER rsp
- decl %gs:pda_irqcount
jmp error_exit
CFI_ENDPROC
END(do_hypervisor_callback)
--
1.6.0.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-26 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-26 14:22 [PATCH 0/4] Remove interrupt stack table usage from x86_64 kernel (v2) Avi Kivity
2008-12-26 14:22 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86: drop the use of the tss interrupt stack table (IST) Avi Kivity
2008-12-26 14:22 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2008-12-26 14:22 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86: Make interrupt stack switching atomic Avi Kivity
2008-12-26 14:22 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86: Move NMI back to interrupt stack Avi Kivity
2008-12-26 14:35 ` [PATCH 0/4] Remove interrupt stack table usage from x86_64 kernel (v2) Ingo Molnar
2008-12-26 14:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-27 21:42 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1230301344-570-3-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox