From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark McLoughlin Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM : Qemu: update call pci_nic_init Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:31:20 +0000 Message-ID: <1232008280.5205.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <10C63FAD690C13458F0B32BCED571F1403D74F21@pdsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com> Reply-To: Mark McLoughlin Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , Avi Kivity , "Zhang, Xiantao" To: "Zhang, Yang" Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:34544 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754646AbZAOIbZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2009 03:31:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: <10C63FAD690C13458F0B32BCED571F1403D74F21@pdsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 15:36 +0800, Zhang, Yang wrote: > Hi > As the definition pci_nic_init has modified, this patch update the > corresponding calling in ipf_init1(). Yep, qemu/hw/ipf.c isn't upstream so it didn't get updated when the function was changed. Is there a plan to merge ia64 stuff into upstream QEMU? > >From 53a66f524a6c2215d61da797cca4b7b1acbb1266 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Yang > Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:09:43 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] KVM : Qemu: update call pci_nic_init > > update call pci_nic_init in ipf_init1 > > Signed-off-by: Xiantao Zhang > Signed-off-by: Yang Zhang Acked-by: Mark McLoughlin Cheers, Mark.