From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kvm: configure: --with-patched-kernel doesn't need
 kernelversion
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:10:48 +0000
Message-ID: <1232968248.3724.73.camel@blaa>
References: <1232966602-28492-1-git-send-email-markmc@redhat.com>
	 <1232966602-28492-2-git-send-email-markmc@redhat.com>
	 <5d6222a80901260257t3b30c100v2a82796e26bf93fd@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:40425 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750854AbZAZLKz (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:10:55 -0500
In-Reply-To: <5d6222a80901260257t3b30c100v2a82796e26bf93fd@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 08:57 -0200, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
> 
> Why not?
> 
> I use it regularly to unequivocally define what kernel tree I'm using.
> The default
> is often not the right choice.

It is only used by depmod when installing kvm.ko ... which we don't do
with --with-patched-kernel

Cheers,
Mark.