public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@hp.com>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	"Yang, Sheng" <sheng.yang@intel.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] KVM: Fix potentially recursively get kvm lock
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 09:34:29 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1243006469.27733.59.camel@lappy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090522150623.GD20823@sequoia.sous-sol.org>

On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 08:06 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Alex Williamson (alex.williamson@hp.com) wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 19:09 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > KVM: workaround workqueue / deassign_host_irq deadlock
> > > 
> > > I think I'm running into the following deadlock in the kvm kernel module
> > > when trying to use device assignment:
> > > 
> > > CPU A                               CPU B
> > > kvm_vm_ioctl_deassign_dev_irq()
> > >   mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);           worker_thread()
> > >   -> kvm_deassign_irq()               ->
> > > kvm_assigned_dev_interrupt_work_handler()
> > >     -> deassign_host_irq()              mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
> > >       -> cancel_work_sync() [blocked]
> > > 
> > > Workaround the issue by dropping kvm->lock for cancel_work_sync().
> 
> Is this still pending?

I haven't seen this particular workaround make it into a tree, however
Marcelo has been working on a set of patches to properly fix this.  Most
recent version was sent on 5/20.

Alex



  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-22 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-12  9:05 device-assignment deadlock Yang, Sheng
2009-05-12  9:32 ` [PATCH 1/1] KVM: Fix potentially recursively get kvm lock Sheng Yang
2009-05-12 11:55   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-12 14:13     ` Yang, Sheng
2009-05-12 14:30       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-12 15:59         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-12 19:44         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-12 21:36           ` Alex Williamson
2009-05-12 22:09             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-12 22:17               ` Alex Williamson
2009-05-22 15:06                 ` Chris Wright
2009-05-22 15:34                   ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2009-05-22 15:36                     ` Chris Wright
2009-05-13  2:07               ` Yang, Sheng
2009-05-13 13:14                 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-13 11:43         ` Gleb Natapov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1243006469.27733.59.camel@lappy \
    --to=alex.williamson@hp.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=sheng.yang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox