From: ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, avi@redhat.com
Cc: ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
cotte@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, mtosatti@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] kvm: remove redundant declarations
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 17:43:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1243525388-3625-5-git-send-email-ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1243525388-3625-1-git-send-email-ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Changing s390 code in kvm_arch_vcpu_load/put come across this header
declarations. They are complete duplicates, not even useful forward
declarations as nothing using it is in between (according to git
blame the s390 and ia64 contributions introducing the first arch
independency overlapped and added it twice).
This patch removes the two dispensable lines.
Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
[diffstat]
kvm_host.h | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
[diff]
Index: kvm/include/linux/kvm_host.h
===================================================================
--- kvm.orig/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ kvm/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -241,8 +241,6 @@ long kvm_arch_dev_ioctl(struct file *fil
unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg);
long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp,
unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg);
-void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu);
-void kvm_arch_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
int kvm_dev_ioctl_check_extension(long ext);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-28 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-28 15:43 [PATCH 0/5] kvm-s390: revised version of kvm-s390 guest memory handling - v4 ehrhardt
2009-05-28 15:43 ` [PATCH 1/5] kvm-s390: infrastructure to kick vcpus out of guest state - v3 ehrhardt
2009-05-28 15:43 ` [PATCH 2/5] kvm-s390: fix interruption casued by signal - v2 ehrhardt
2009-05-28 15:43 ` [PATCH 3/5] kvm-s390: update vcpu->cpu ehrhardt
2009-05-28 15:43 ` ehrhardt [this message]
2009-05-28 15:43 ` [PATCH 5/5] kvm-s390: streamline memslot handling - v4 ehrhardt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-29 8:21 [PATCH 0/5] kvm-s390: revised version of kvm-s390 guest memory handling - v5 ehrhardt
2009-05-29 8:21 ` [PATCH 4/5] kvm: remove redundant declarations ehrhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1243525388-3625-5-git-send-email-ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cotte@de.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox