From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] VMX Unrestricted mode support
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 11:35:34 -0700
Message-ID: <1243881334.30052.2.camel@mukti.sc.intel.com>
References: <1243552292.25456.23.camel@mukti.sc.intel.com>
	 <4A224229.6090108@redhat.com> <1243879609.30052.1.camel@mukti.sc.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:44635 "EHLO mga11.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750992AbZFASfd (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:35:33 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1243879609.30052.1.camel@mukti.sc.intel.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 11:06 -0700, Nitin A Kamble wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 01:39 -0700, Avi Kivity wrote:

> > Instead of changing all the checks like this, you can make rmode.active 
> > be false when unrestricted guest is enabled.  We can interpret 
> > rmode.active as "emulating real mode via vm86", not as "guest is in real 
> > mode".

Avi,
 How about renaming rmode.active to rmode.vm86_active ?

Thanks & Regards,
Nitin