From: ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, avi@redhat.com
Cc: ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
cotte@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, mtosatti@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] kvm-s390: revised version of kvm-s390 guest memory handling - rebased
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 16:26:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1243952771-32428-1-git-send-email-ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
From: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@de.ibm.com>
As requested this is a rebased patch on top of the already applied v3
of the patch series.
*updates to already applied version*
- ensure the wait_on_bit waiter is notified
- move the reset of requests to kvm_vcpu_release to drop them early
- ensure dropping all vcpu requests while freeing a vcpu
- ensure kick allocations (might_sleep) are out of atomic context
- update vcpu->cpu in kvm-s390 arch handler for load/put
- centralize consumption of vcpu->request bits
- updates on running vcpus can now be handled without need to rerun the vcpu
- kvm_arch_set_memory_region waits until the bit is consumed by the vcpu
- kickout only scheduled vcpus (wait might hang forever on non-scheduled vcpus)
Note: further unification of make_all_cpu_request and the kick mechanism is
planned, but it might be good to split it from this step towards commonality.
Patches included:
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] kvm-s390: infrastructure to kick vcpus out of guest state - rebased
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] kvm-s390: update vcpu->cpu - rebased
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] kvm-s390: streamline memslot handling - rebased
Overall-Diffstat:
arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c | 10 ++++++----
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 4 ++++
6 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2009-06-02 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-02 14:26 ehrhardt [this message]
2009-06-02 14:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] kvm-s390: infrastructure to kick vcpus out of guest state - rebased ehrhardt
2009-06-02 14:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] kvm-s390: update vcpu->cpu " ehrhardt
2009-06-02 14:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] kvm-s390: streamline memslot handling " ehrhardt
2009-06-05 20:53 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-06-08 10:51 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2009-06-08 11:10 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-08 12:05 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2009-06-08 12:09 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-09 0:56 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-06-14 12:04 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-15 13:47 ` Christian Ehrhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1243952771-32428-1-git-send-email-ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cotte@de.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox