From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues <lmr@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Autotest] Log message format in KVM-Autotest
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:17:19 -0300
Message-ID: <1244488639.2849.288.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <195912611.1415471244457345204.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
	 <1244466195.2849.37.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <33307c790906081115g543023c9o6d1b048c290a7ae2@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Michael Goldish <mgoldish@redhat.com>,
	Autotest mailing list <autotest@test.kernel.org>,
	KVM List <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Martin Bligh <mbligh@google.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:47367 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751893AbZFHTRa (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:17:30 -0400
In-Reply-To: <33307c790906081115g543023c9o6d1b048c290a7ae2@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 11:15 -0700, Martin Bligh wrote:
> if it's specific to one test or whatever, you could also just put it
> inside the message?
> Possibly with your own wrapper function around the logging?

Yes, it's a possibility, but I'd rather avoid it. IMHO the current
logging configuration is a good compromise between verbosity and the
ability to debug problems on our code.

-- 
Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
Software Engineer (QE)
Red Hat - Emerging Technologies