From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues <lmr@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [KVM-AUTOTEST PATCH] Adding iperf test
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:57:16 -0300
Message-ID: <1246463836.14963.10.camel@freedom>
References: <1245187799-7757-1-git-send-email-lmr@redhat.com>
	 <a50cf5ab0906300152h1839f596nf6164f38e58090e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <7fac565a0907010443pb06a5chc6ee789cc31d6c25@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: sudhir kumar <smalikphy@gmail.com>, autotest@test.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Eromenko <aeromenk@redhat.com>
To: Alexey Eremenko <al4321@gmail.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:34283 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753549AbZGAP5T (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:57:19 -0400
In-Reply-To: <7fac565a0907010443pb06a5chc6ee789cc31d6c25@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 14:43 +0300, Alexey Eremenko wrote:
> LMR: me too, hate putting binaries in source tree, but the alternative
> option is to provide separate *.tar.bz2 for all the binary utils, and
> I don't sure which way is better.

Yes, I don't have a clear idea as well. It's currently under
discussion...

Lucas