From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues Subject: Re: [Autotest] [KVM-AUTOTEST PATCH] Adding iperf test Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:29:13 -0300 Message-ID: <1246480161.16310.3.camel@freedom> References: <1245187799-7757-1-git-send-email-lmr@redhat.com> <7fac565a0907010443pb06a5chc6ee789cc31d6c25@mail.gmail.com> <1246463836.14963.10.camel@freedom> <33307c790907010918n36d78ea5r55c53d1639e6eb3f@mail.gmail.com> <4A4B9982.4090909@redhat.com> <33307c790907011016o262b857arad5c8e00ca96d969@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Avi Kivity , Alexey Eremenko , autotest@test.kernel.org, Alexey Eromenko , kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Martin Bligh Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:47150 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753691AbZGAUau (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:30:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <33307c790907011016o262b857arad5c8e00ca96d969@mail.gmail.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 10:16 -0700, Martin Bligh wrote: > >>>> LMR: me too, hate putting binaries in source tree, but the alternative > >>>> option is to provide separate *.tar.bz2 for all the binary utils, and > >>>> I don't sure which way is better. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Yes, I don't have a clear idea as well. It's currently under > >>> discussion... > >>> > >> > >> Is KVM x86_64 only? > >> > > > > It's x86-64, i386, ia64, s390, and powerpc 44x/e500 only. > > OK, then it's difficult to see using binaries? Can we not > compile these on the system at use time (see the client/deps > directory for other stuff we do this for) Biggest trouble is compiling the test under windows hosts. We are figuring out a way to work around this problem.