From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: mmu_notifiers: turn off lockdep around mm_take_all_locks
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 21:04:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1246993442.5197.15.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090707183741.GA8393@amt.cnet>
On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 15:37 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Is there any way around this other than completly shutting down lockdep?
> >>>
> >>
> >> When we created this the promise was that kvm would only do this on a
> >> fresh mm with only a few vmas, has that changed
> >
> > The number of vmas did increase, but not materially. We do link with
> > more shared libraries though.
>
> Yeah, see attached /proc/pid/maps just before the ioctl thats ends up in
> mmu_notifier_register.
>
> mm_take_all_locks: file_vma=79 anon_vma=40
Another issue, at about >=256 vmas we'll overflow the preempt count. So
disabling lockdep will only 'fix' this for a short while, until you've
bloated beyond that ;-)
Although you could possibly disable preemption and use
__raw_spin_lock(), that would also side-step the whole lockdep issue,
but it feels like such a horrid hack.
Alternatively we would have to modify the rmap locking, but that would
incur overhead on the regular code paths, so that's probably not worth
the trade-off.
Linus, Ingo, any opinions?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-07 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-07 18:06 mmu_notifiers: turn off lockdep around mm_take_all_locks Marcelo Tosatti
2009-07-07 18:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-07 18:18 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-07 18:37 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-07-07 19:04 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-07-07 19:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-07 20:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-07 23:30 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1246993442.5197.15.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox