From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues <lmr@redhat.com>
Subject: [RFC] KVM test: Refactoring the kvm control file and the config
 file
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 08:34:55 -0300
Message-ID: <1248176095.5318.43.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: KVM mailing list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michael Goldish <mgoldish@redhat.com>,
	David Huff <dhuff@redhat.com>, Mike Burns <mburns@redhat.com>
To: Autotest mailing list <autotest@test.kernel.org>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:35346 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753525AbZGULfA (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 21 Jul 2009 07:35:00 -0400
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Currently we have our kvm test control file and configuration file,
having them split like this makes it harder for users to edit it, let's
say, using the web frontend.

So it might be good to merge the control file and the config file, and
make a refactor on the control file code. Do you think this would be a
valid approach? Any comments are welcome.

Lucas