From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] qemu-kvm: virtio-net: Re-instate GSO code removed
 upstream
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:00:26 +0100
Message-ID: <1254416426.2920.41.camel@blaa>
References: <1241459088.26045.1.camel@lappy>
	 <1241513785-28738-1-git-send-email-markmc@redhat.com>
	 <1254257151.29022.11.camel@blaa> <20090930135144.GA29956@infradead.org>
	 <4AC36355.8040908@redhat.com> <1254319160.3105.67.camel@blaa>
	 <4AC4DDA7.9070708@redhat.com>
Reply-To: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43041 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1755757AbZJARCB (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 1 Oct 2009 13:02:01 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4AC4DDA7.9070708@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 18:49 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 09/30/2009 03:59 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > I think we should keep the vlan stuff, just de-emphasise it.
> >    
> 
> Maybe we should do what X.org does, break it silently and remove it some 
> time later when no one complains.

Well, the 'silently' part isn't going to work now, is it?

Anyway, I'm sure at least Jan would notice if his 'dump' backend stopped
working

Cheers,
Mark.