public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ryota Ozaki <ozaki.ryota@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH -tip] sched, cpuacct: fix niced guest time accounting
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 01:20:10 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1256314810-7897-1-git-send-email-ozaki.ryota@gmail.com> (raw)

CPU time of a guest is always accounted in 'user' time
without concern for the nice value of its counterpart
process although the guest is scheduled under the nice
value.

This patch fixes the defect and accounts cpu time of
a niced guest in 'nice' time as same as a niced process.

And also the patch adds 'guest_nice' to cpuacct. The
value provides niced guest cpu time which is like 'nice'
to 'user'.

The original discussions can be found here.
http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@vger.kernel.org/msg23982.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@vger.kernel.org/msg23860.html

Signed-off-by: Ryota Ozaki <ozaki.ryota@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
---
 Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt |    3 ++-
 fs/proc/stat.c                     |   19 +++++++++++++------
 include/linux/kernel_stat.h        |    1 +
 kernel/sched.c                     |    9 +++++++--
 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
index 2c48f94..4af0018 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
@@ -1072,7 +1072,8 @@ second).  The meanings of the columns are as follows, from left to right:
 - irq: servicing interrupts
 - softirq: servicing softirqs
 - steal: involuntary wait
-- guest: running a guest
+- guest: running a normal guest
+- guest_nice: running a niced guest
 
 The "intr" line gives counts of interrupts  serviced since boot time, for each
 of the  possible system interrupts.   The first  column  is the  total of  all
diff --git a/fs/proc/stat.c b/fs/proc/stat.c
index 7cc726c..b9b7aad 100644
--- a/fs/proc/stat.c
+++ b/fs/proc/stat.c
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static int show_stat(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
 	int i, j;
 	unsigned long jif;
 	cputime64_t user, nice, system, idle, iowait, irq, softirq, steal;
-	cputime64_t guest;
+	cputime64_t guest, guest_nice;
 	u64 sum = 0;
 	u64 sum_softirq = 0;
 	unsigned int per_softirq_sums[NR_SOFTIRQS] = {0};
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ static int show_stat(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
 
 	user = nice = system = idle = iowait =
 		irq = softirq = steal = cputime64_zero;
-	guest = cputime64_zero;
+	guest = guest_nice = cputime64_zero;
 	getboottime(&boottime);
 	jif = boottime.tv_sec;
 
@@ -51,6 +51,8 @@ static int show_stat(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
 		softirq = cputime64_add(softirq, kstat_cpu(i).cpustat.softirq);
 		steal = cputime64_add(steal, kstat_cpu(i).cpustat.steal);
 		guest = cputime64_add(guest, kstat_cpu(i).cpustat.guest);
+		guest_nice = cputime64_add(guest_nice,
+			kstat_cpu(i).cpustat.guest_nice);
 		for_each_irq_nr(j) {
 			sum += kstat_irqs_cpu(j, i);
 		}
@@ -65,7 +67,8 @@ static int show_stat(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
 	}
 	sum += arch_irq_stat();
 
-	seq_printf(p, "cpu  %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu\n",
+	seq_printf(p, "cpu  %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu "
+		"%llu\n",
 		(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(user),
 		(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(nice),
 		(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(system),
@@ -74,7 +77,8 @@ static int show_stat(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
 		(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(irq),
 		(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(softirq),
 		(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(steal),
-		(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(guest));
+		(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(guest),
+		(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(guest_nice));
 	for_each_online_cpu(i) {
 
 		/* Copy values here to work around gcc-2.95.3, gcc-2.96 */
@@ -88,8 +92,10 @@ static int show_stat(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
 		softirq = kstat_cpu(i).cpustat.softirq;
 		steal = kstat_cpu(i).cpustat.steal;
 		guest = kstat_cpu(i).cpustat.guest;
+		guest_nice = kstat_cpu(i).cpustat.guest_nice;
 		seq_printf(p,
-			"cpu%d %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu\n",
+			"cpu%d %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu "
+			"%llu\n",
 			i,
 			(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(user),
 			(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(nice),
@@ -99,7 +105,8 @@ static int show_stat(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
 			(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(irq),
 			(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(softirq),
 			(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(steal),
-			(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(guest));
+			(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(guest),
+			(unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(guest_nice));
 	}
 	seq_printf(p, "intr %llu", (unsigned long long)sum);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/kernel_stat.h b/include/linux/kernel_stat.h
index 348fa88..c059044 100644
--- a/include/linux/kernel_stat.h
+++ b/include/linux/kernel_stat.h
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ struct cpu_usage_stat {
 	cputime64_t iowait;
 	cputime64_t steal;
 	cputime64_t guest;
+	cputime64_t guest_nice;
 };
 
 struct kernel_stat {
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 00f9e71..8dd285e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -5017,8 +5017,13 @@ static void account_guest_time(struct task_struct *p, cputime_t cputime,
 	p->gtime = cputime_add(p->gtime, cputime);
 
 	/* Add guest time to cpustat. */
-	cpustat->user = cputime64_add(cpustat->user, tmp);
-	cpustat->guest = cputime64_add(cpustat->guest, tmp);
+	if (TASK_NICE(p) > 0) {
+		cpustat->nice = cputime64_add(cpustat->nice, tmp);
+		cpustat->guest_nice = cputime64_add(cpustat->guest_nice, tmp);
+	} else {
+		cpustat->user = cputime64_add(cpustat->user, tmp);
+		cpustat->guest = cputime64_add(cpustat->guest, tmp);
+	}
 }
 
 /*
-- 
1.6.2.5

             reply	other threads:[~2009-10-23 16:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-23 16:20 Ryota Ozaki [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-10-20 15:00 [PATCH] sched, cpuacct: fix niced guest time accounting Ryota Ozaki
2009-10-22  9:47 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-22 12:12   ` Ryota Ozaki
2009-10-22 15:36     ` [PATCH -tip] " Ryota Ozaki
2009-10-23 11:19       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-23 16:23         ` Ryota Ozaki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1256314810-7897-1-git-send-email-ozaki.ryota@gmail.com \
    --to=ozaki.ryota@gmail.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox