From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Shirley Ma <mashirle@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: vhost-net patches
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 07:48:10 -0700
Message-ID: <1256654890.4753.7.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20091022131332.GB6961@redhat.com>
	 <1256232224.6601.17.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <20091022174344.GA10821@redhat.com>
	 <1256234420.27706.5.camel@w-sridhar.beaverton.ibm.com>
	 <20091023110438.GA20229@redhat.com>
	 <1256310168.4443.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <1256310765.4443.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <1256325855.17324.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <20091025091117.GA9270@redhat.com>
	 <1256593067.10142.10.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <20091027063805.GA26914@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com>, Shirley Ma <xma@us.ibm.com>,
	David Stevens <dlstevens@us.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	sri@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mashirle@linux.vnet.ibm.com
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from e38.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.159]:57368 "EHLO
	e38.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753555AbZJ0Os3 (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:48:29 -0400
Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227])
	by e38.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n9REiCj9013617
	for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:44:12 -0600
Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170])
	by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id n9REmIS7038904
	for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:48:24 -0600
Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1])
	by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id n9R8lN4I019555
	for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 02:47:23 -0600
In-Reply-To: <20091027063805.GA26914@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 08:38 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Yes but you need to make host send packets out to tap as well,
> somehow. One way to do this is to assign IP address in
> a separate subnet to tap in host and to eth device in guest.

Thanks for the hint, I will make a try.

Shirley