From: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues <lmr@redhat.com>
To: Yolkfull Chow <yzhou@redhat.com>
Cc: autotest@test.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Autotest PATCH] KVM-test: Add a subtest 'qemu_img'
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:14:44 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1264684484.2416.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100128093726.GB2356@aFu.nay.redhat.com>
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 17:37 +0800, Yolkfull Chow wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 03:11:34PM -0200, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
> > That said, I was wondering if we could consolidate all qemu-img tests to
> > a single execution, instead of splitting it to several variants. We
> > could keep a failure record, execute all tests and fail the entire test
> > if any of them failed. It's not like terribly important, but it seems
> > more logical to group all qemu-img subcommands testing under a single
> > test.
>
> Hi Lucas,
>
> After considering above suggestion about merging all qemu-img tests into single test,
> I did decision that keep current method due to reason that:
> 1) it's convenient to maintain so many parameters of each test variant.
> 2) current method does not affect global results since even if one subtest of 'qemu-img' failes,
> it will nor block following subtests (we can still get whole test results)
> 3) it's possible for user to run single subtest of qemu-img, say only test 'rebase' subcommand
>
> As you also said this is not terribly important, let's keep it going. What's your opinion?
Ok, I am fine with it!
Lucas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-28 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-26 3:25 [Autotest PATCH] KVM-test: Add a subtest 'qemu_img' Yolkfull Chow
2010-01-26 17:11 ` [Autotest] " Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-01-27 9:41 ` Yolkfull Chow
2010-01-27 11:13 ` Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-01-28 9:37 ` [Autotest] " Yolkfull Chow
2010-01-28 13:14 ` Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues [this message]
[not found] <2023444877.247901264595238261.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2010-01-27 12:37 ` Michael Goldish
2010-01-28 3:07 ` Yolkfull Chow
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-29 7:00 Yolkfull Chow
2010-01-29 7:20 ` Yolkfull Chow
2010-03-17 13:38 ` Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1264684484.2416.0.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=lmr@redhat.com \
--cc=autotest@test.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yzhou@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox