From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues <lmr@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Autotest PATCH] KVM-test: Add a subtest 'qemu_img'
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:14:44 -0200
Message-ID: <1264684484.2416.0.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <1264476309-4867-1-git-send-email-yzhou@redhat.com>
	<1264525894.2316.89.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<20100128093726.GB2356@aFu.nay.redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: autotest@test.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Yolkfull Chow <yzhou@redhat.com>
Return-path: <autotest-bounces@test.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100128093726.GB2356@aFu.nay.redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest>,
	<mailto:autotest-request@test.kernel.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://test.kernel.org/pipermail/autotest>
List-Post: <mailto:autotest@test.kernel.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autotest-request@test.kernel.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest>,
	<mailto:autotest-request@test.kernel.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: autotest-bounces@test.kernel.org
Errors-To: autotest-bounces@test.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 17:37 +0800, Yolkfull Chow wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 03:11:34PM -0200, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
> > That said, I was wondering if we could consolidate all qemu-img tests to
> > a single execution, instead of splitting it to several variants. We
> > could keep a failure record, execute all tests and fail the entire test
> > if any of them failed. It's not like terribly important, but it seems
> > more logical to group all qemu-img subcommands testing under a single
> > test.
> 
> Hi Lucas,
> 
> After considering above suggestion about merging all qemu-img tests into single test,
> I did decision that keep current method due to reason that:
>  1) it's convenient to maintain so many parameters of each test variant.
>  2) current method does not affect global results since even if one subtest of 'qemu-img' failes,
>     it will nor block following subtests (we can still get whole test results)
>  3) it's possible for user to run single subtest of qemu-img, say only test 'rebase' subcommand
> 
> As you also said this is not terribly important, let's keep it going. What's your opinion?

Ok, I am fine with it!

Lucas