From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/2] [scsi-bus]: Add PR-OUT and PR-IN case for SCSIRequest xfer and xfer_mode setup Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 06:03:19 -0700 Message-ID: <1276693399.12514.221.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> References: <1275270181-10992-1-git-send-email-nab@linux-iscsi.org> <4C090883.70704@redhat.com> <4C18C001.4050106@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Gerd Hoffmann , kvm-devel , qemu-devel , Hannes Reinecke , Christoph Hellwig , Paul Brook To: Kevin Wolf Return-path: Received: from smtp128.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.65.187]:22146 "HELO smtp128.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753621Ab0FPNDW (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:03:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4C18C001.4050106@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 14:13 +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 04.06.2010 16:06, schrieb Kevin Wolf: > > Am 31.05.2010 03:43, schrieb Nicholas A. Bellinger: > >> From: Nicholas Bellinger > >> > >> This patch updates hw/scsi-bus.c to add PERSISTENT_RESERVE_OUT and PERSISTENT_RESERVE_IN > >> case in scsi_req_length() to extra the incoming buffer length into SCSIRequest->cmd.xfer, > >> and adds a second PERSISTENT_RESERVE_OUT case in scsi_req_xfer_mode() in order to properly > >> set SCSI_XFER_TO_DEV for WRITE data. > >> > >> Tested with Linux KVM guests and Megasas 8708EM2 HBA emulation and TCM_Loop target ports. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Nicholas A. Bellinger > >> --- > >> hw/scsi-bus.c | 5 +++++ > >> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/hw/scsi-bus.c b/hw/scsi-bus.c > >> index b8e4b71..75ec74e 100644 > >> --- a/hw/scsi-bus.c > >> +++ b/hw/scsi-bus.c > >> @@ -325,6 +325,10 @@ static int scsi_req_length(SCSIRequest *req, uint8_t *cmd) > >> case INQUIRY: > >> req->cmd.xfer = cmd[4] | (cmd[3] << 8); > >> break; > >> + case PERSISTENT_RESERVE_OUT: > >> + case PERSISTENT_RESERVE_IN: > >> + req->cmd.xfer = cmd[8] | (cmd[7] << 8); > > > > Maybe I'm missing something, but isn't exactly the same value set in the > > switch block above? (for cmd[0] >> 5 == 2) > > Nicholas? This isn't applied yet because I'm waiting for your answer. > > Is there a reason why it makes sense to do it explicitly here instead > using the generic code a few lines above? I think the same applied to > patch 2/2. Hi Kevin, I just tested this again and you are correct, the reassignment of req->cmd.xfer for PR and Maintence CDBs is unnecessary in scsi_req_length(). I will go ahead and drop part this from my tree. Please let me know if you would like me to resend the patch series. Best, --nab