From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Williamson Subject: Re: KVM call agenda for July 27 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:13:28 -0600 Message-ID: <1280189608.4601.237.camel@x201> References: <20100726212849.GB2651@x200.localdomain> <4C4E0C05.5030004@codemonkey.ws> <4C4E1A33.7050709@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Chris Wright , kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Daniel P. Berrange" To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43845 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752877Ab0G0ANf (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:13:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4C4E1A33.7050709@codemonkey.ws> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 18:28 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 07/26/2010 05:28 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > On 07/26/2010 04:28 PM, Chris Wright wrote: > >> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. > > > > - 0.13 update > > I'll pre-empt the 0.13 question with an answer. I'm just testing > > the VNC changes and if all goes well, I'll tag tonight. > > > > Initial thinking is to keep 0.14 short and target Dec 1st. > > > > - if danpb can make it, would like to discuss -help output parsing > > summary: help parsing is terrible, but given the fact that > > capabilities is going to take a while to get totally right, would like > > to discuss an interim solution that gives us more flexibility to do > > reasonable things with the help output. > > - any additional input on probed_raw? - cpu model #s, does anyone know things that would break if we bumped the qemu64 model up to 13 (or higher?) and made definitions for Conroe/Penryn/Nehalem use more representative model #s?