From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [RFC v2 0/7] kvm stael time implementation Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:37:20 +0200 Message-ID: <1283186240.1820.1161.camel@laptop> References: <1283184391-7785-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, avi@redhat.com, zamsden@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, riel@redhat.com, mingo@elte.hu, jeremy@goop.org To: Glauber Costa Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:44851 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755862Ab0H3Qhn convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:37:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1283184391-7785-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 12:06 -0400, Glauber Costa wrote: > > Have a nice review. > Glauber Costa (7): > change headers preparing for steal time > always call kvm_write_guest > measure time out of guest > change kernel accounting to include steal time > kvm steal time implementation > touch softlockup watchdog > tell guest about steal time feature Something's gone wrong, I've got at least 15 emails in this thread. Also, please try again but now with --no-chain-reply-to, threads nested this deep are useless for reviewing.