From: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues <lmr@redhat.com>
To: pradeep <psuriset@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: autotest@test.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com,
akong@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com, mgoldish@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/18] KVM test: Add a subtest jumbo
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:07:19 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1285758439.2505.9.camel@freedom> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100929121233.430ac5ef@skywalker>
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 12:12 +0530, pradeep wrote:
> O
>
> > + Test the RX jumbo frame function of vnics:
> > +
> > + 1) Boot the VM.
> > + 2) Change the MTU of guest nics and host taps depending on the
> > NIC model.
> > + 3) Add the static ARP entry for guest NIC.
> > + 4) Wait for the MTU ok.
> > + 5) Verify the path MTU using ping.
> > + 6) Ping the guest with large frames.
> > + 7) Increment size ping.
> > + 8) Flood ping the guest with large frames.
> > + 9) Verify the path MTU.
> > + 10) Recover the MTU.
> > +
>
> Thanks for new set of patches.
>
> Jumbo fails again since MTU is not as expected even.
Not as expected even after 10 seconds. The idea is to change the MTU,
wait a little while and check it again. Yes, I also got this problem
doing my test of the patch. Need to check why that is happening.
> 02:46:14 INFO | Removing the temporary ARP entry
> 02:46:14 DEBUG| Running 'arp -d 10.168.0.6 -i kvmbr0'
> 02:46:14 ERROR| Test failed: TestError: MTU is not as expected even
> after 10 seconds 02:46:14 DEBUG| Postprocessing VM 'vm2'...
> 02:46:14 DEBUG| VM object found in environment
> 02:46:14 DEBUG| Terminating screendump thread...
>
>
> > + logging.info("Removing the temporary ARP entry")
> > + utils.run("arp -d %s -i %s" % (ip, bridge))
> >
>
> I am just trying to understand, why are we trying to remove same
> guest ip arp cache. For sure host ip will be there in arp cache.
> Try with host ip @eth*. It works fine for me.
>
>
>
> Thanks
> Pradeep
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-29 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-27 22:43 [PATCH 00/18] Network Patchset v4 Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-09-27 22:43 ` [PATCH 01/18] KVM test: Add a new macaddress pool algorithm Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-09-27 22:43 ` [PATCH 02/18] KVM test: Make physical_resources_check to work with MAC management Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-09-27 22:43 ` [PATCH 03/18] KVM test: Remove address_pools.cfg dependency Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-09-27 22:43 ` [PATCH 04/18] KVM test: Add a get_ifname function Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-09-27 22:43 ` [PATCH 05/18] KVM Test: Add nw related functions ping and get_linux_ifname Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-09-27 22:43 ` [PATCH 06/18] KVM test: Add a new subtest ping Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-09-27 22:43 ` [PATCH 07/18] KVM test: Add a subtest jumbo Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-09-29 6:42 ` pradeep
2010-09-29 11:07 ` Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues [this message]
2010-09-29 11:33 ` pradeep
2010-09-29 20:21 ` Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-09-30 7:05 ` pradeep
2010-09-27 22:43 ` [PATCH 08/18] KVM test: Add basic file transfer test Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-09-28 13:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-09-29 11:45 ` pradeep
2010-09-29 12:33 ` Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-09-29 14:08 ` Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-09-29 17:43 ` Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-09-27 22:43 ` [PATCH 09/18] KVM test: Add a subtest of load/unload nic driver Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-10-06 5:49 ` Amos Kong
2010-09-27 22:43 ` [PATCH 10/18] KVM test: Add a subtest of nic promisc Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-09-27 22:43 ` [PATCH 11/18] KVM test: Add a subtest of multicast Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-09-30 9:30 ` pradeep
2010-10-05 12:21 ` Amos Kong
2010-10-05 12:44 ` Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-09-27 22:43 ` [PATCH 12/18] KVM test: Add a subtest of pxe Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-09-27 22:43 ` [PATCH 13/18] KVM test: Add a subtest of changing MAC address Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-09-30 8:21 ` pradeep
2010-09-27 22:44 ` [PATCH 14/18] KVM test: Add a netperf subtest Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-10-05 9:00 ` pradeep
2010-10-05 12:59 ` Amos Kong
2010-10-06 10:48 ` pradeep
2010-09-27 22:44 ` [PATCH 15/18] KVM test: kvm_utils - Add support of check if remote port free Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-09-27 22:44 ` [PATCH 16/18] KVM test: Improve vlan subtest Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-09-30 6:59 ` pradeep
2010-10-05 12:56 ` Amos Kong
2010-09-27 22:44 ` [PATCH 17/18] KVM test: vlan subtest - Replace extra_params '-snapshot' with image_snapshot Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-09-27 22:44 ` [PATCH 18/18] KVM test: Add subtest of testing offload by ethtool Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-10-06 8:56 ` pradeep
2010-10-06 9:59 ` [Autotest] " pradeep
2010-10-06 15:55 ` Ryan Harper
2010-10-06 16:57 ` Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-10-07 2:09 ` [PATCH 00/18] Network Patchset v4 Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-10-07 13:45 ` [Autotest] " pradeep
2010-10-07 13:54 ` Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-10-07 14:37 ` pradeep
2010-10-07 15:00 ` [Autotest] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-10-08 12:27 ` Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-09-14 22:25 [PATCH 00/18] KVM autotest network patchset v3 Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2010-09-14 22:25 ` [PATCH 07/18] KVM test: Add a subtest jumbo Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1285758439.2505.9.camel@freedom \
--to=lmr@redhat.com \
--cc=akong@redhat.com \
--cc=autotest@test.kernel.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgoldish@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=psuriset@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox