From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] KVM: Allow host IRQ sharing for passed-through PCI 2.3 devices
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 09:57:47 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1288799867.3045.149.camel@x201> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101103084320.GF6772@redhat.com>
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 10:43 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 09:11:16AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> >
> > PCI 2.3 allows to generically disable IRQ sources at device level. This
> > enables us to share IRQs of such devices between on the host side when
> > passing them to a guest. This feature is optional, user space has to
> > request it explicitly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>
>
> I just realized something.
> With this patch, if guest ever looks at
> interrupt disable bit, it will go crazy as that bit goes on/off by
> itself. I guess we could have an ioctl to set/clear the bit on
> device, and have qemu call that on config write into command/status
> register.
>
> There's also something I don't completely unerstand with current code:
> how does interrupt sharing work? E.g. can assigned and emulated
> devices share an interrupt?
I've been pondering this with VFIO too. There it seems to work, even
when I enable irqfd. The VFIO kernel/qemu driver needs to filter EOIs
based on whether the interrupt was actually asserted by the device, but
I think we're likely relying somewhat on interrupts being reasserted to
help us keep everything serviced.
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-03 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1288771873.git.jan.kiszka@web.de>
[not found] ` <628f014fb1efb8e2208db03d13198ba301a3a34c.1288771873.git.jan.kiszka@web.de>
[not found] ` <20101103082921.GD6772@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <4CD123B8.8080607@web.de>
2010-11-03 9:10 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] KVM: Allow host IRQ sharing for passed-through PCI 2.3 devices Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-03 9:18 ` Jan Kiszka
[not found] ` <20101103084320.GF6772@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <4CD1227E.9020908@web.de>
2010-11-03 9:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-03 9:15 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-03 9:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-03 15:57 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2010-11-03 17:27 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-03 17:35 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-03 17:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-03 17:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-03 17:45 ` Jan Kiszka
[not found] ` <128511f28870098dbd57bdaa081dd30ac2af70df.1288771873.git.jan.kiszka@web.de>
2010-11-03 22:13 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] KVM: Switch assigned device IRQ forwarding to threaded handler Marcelo Tosatti
2010-11-03 22:32 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1288799867.3045.149.camel@x201 \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).